You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bots and Manual Curation idea
Well, it's an idea, at least. That's more than most people have contributed to the solution.
Still, the community seems to be divided on whether bot voting is even a bad thing to begin with. Unless everyone agrees that it is a problem, nothing will get done to solve it.
So full of enthusiasm :)
Yes, there are pros and cons to bots but one thing seems to be consistent, manual curators find better content usually and it means that the heavily auto-voted providers don't become complacent and lazy.
@beanz had an idea that whales, and possibly dolphins, could employ manual curators and simply oversee them, cutting out the time consuming work of finding new stuff that is valuable or old steemians that bring something new.
Also im working out how to do promotion for those willing to pay a fee and trust me. Im thinking mostly through the various podcasts and radio shows connected to discord but idk. I seem to connect ppl that i believe will give the other something. So idk what thats called. Recruitment? Asset management?
It is called employment. I have written several posts on similar. Here is one from 2 months ago:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@tarazkp/steemit-idea-number-upvote-markers
Employment is what you call bring two people together who inspire each or has what the other needs?
One needs work performed, the other needs to get paid for the work they perform.
Hmm. Im tired n so cant reply intelligently. Lol. But i will ask. If you are posting all these great ideas ... when will we make it happen? How? Can captcga work on open source blockchain? Will whales care to employ minnows when bots mighg work better and faster at getting instate returns??? Etc and on
Captcha can be used on the BC as it is on the interface only and coding attaches it ti the chain.
If the bots are disincentivised enough, they will employ or curate manually.
Timeframe? That is up to management.
I got leas than 2 hours sleep myself, so short replies at the moment. :)
You are quite right. Bot voting is usually seen as a necessary evil for investors to get their ROI. Suggestions that this post gives are a starting point and they can be implemented only if this acceptability decreases.