Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     8 years ago 

    Dear @shankstaicho,

    you addressed only one of issue. Here are the remaining issues:

    • you submitted your contribution in "development" category but your text is written in a tutorial like style - If you want it to be a tutorial, please change the category.
    • development contributions are only allowed in English - if you want to stick with development, please remove any non-English text
    • your GitHub link at the end of the contribution is broken
    • there are various C# alarm clock implementations already published - make sure to point out how your implementation is different from existing tools and why another implementation was needed.
    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       8 years ago 

      Sir @crokkon , I thought it was instructive and changed the category, please check again.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         8 years ago 

        Your contribution is still in "development" category.

        • You submitted your contribution in "development" category but your text is written in a tutorial like style - This is not appropriate for development contributions
        • your GitHub link at the end of the contribution is broken
        • your repository still contains no license
        • there are various C# alarm clock implementations already published - make sure to point out how your implementation is different from existing tools and why another implementation was needed.

        Please address all issues above before requesting another review.

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           8 years ago 

          sir @crokkon , I corrected the article, but it was a problem and it returned to its former state, but now I have reorganized and changed it.

          $0.00
            Reply
            [-]
             8 years ago 

            @crokkon I moved to the tutorial category , I think it would be more useful in this category.

            $0.00
              Reply
              [-]
               8 years ago 

              Dear @shankstaicho,
              I'm sorry, but I'm rejecting your contribution at this point. You barely addressed any of the remarks. The repository is not correct anymore as a tutorial and the content is lacking a lot of details and explanations for a tutorial. Your contribution would still need a lot of work to be quality-wise on the level of other tutorials and is even then not providing much value content-wise. For good tutorial contributions see for example those from @scipio.

              $0.00
                Reply
                [-]
                 8 years ago 

                No, I did not do it barely, but I corrected it via steemit, so I did not register, so I apologize for your wrongdoing, but I corrected it again

                $0.00
                  Reply
                  [-]
                   8 years ago 

                  I know I made you busy too I apologize please will you think again @crokkon :) <3

                  $0.00
                    Reply

                    Coin Marketplace

                    STEEM 0.08
                    TRX 0.30
                    JST 0.035
                    BTC 109812.05
                    ETH 3841.53
                    USDT 1.00
                    SBD 0.49