[Accusta for Steem] Changes in the report "Voting for witnesses" (v1.3.2)

in #utopian-io4 years ago (edited)

https://github.com/semasping/Accusta - Accusta - this is a service with Statistic of Steem Accounts.

In 1.3.2 release of accusta_logo_line_170.png:

  • [add] Implemented "gests" (vote weight) of the user in the report "Vote for witnesses" in Golos Blockchain.
  • [bug] Fixed bug with duplicate account operations in the local database.

Now a little more

"Gests" in the report "Vote for witnesses".

Actually, sort by gests in table report, also last sort by time you can find in the History page. This was done at the requests of users.
By the way there is difference between gests value in this report and value in the Witnesses rating page golos.io.

  • Probably this depends on the different update periods in the reports. Accusta updates every 1.5 hours.
  • Also, in this report, the account of the delegated portion of gests of the voter is disabled. This is done intentionally. The experience on Steemit showed the lack of consideration of the delegated part of the vote in the voting for the witness.

Duplicate account operations in the local database.

The fact was revealed that when receiving operations from the blockchain, some operations are saved several times. The analysis showed during the caching process that incorrect data is stored. As a result, the caching process was checked when receiving operations from the blockchain. This allowed to exclude the preservation of incorrect data.

Link to comparing changes for this release:


In the future

  • Reduce the time for open the report page Voting for witnesses.
  • Reward of the witness for the Golos platform. In one of the latest SoftFork Golos was added the operation included witnesses reward for block signature.
  • The report about rewards of a witness by month on chart

Thanks for the contribution, @semasping! For development contributions we currently only take commits or pull requests made in the last 14 days into account when reviewing a contribution, so that's what will happen in this case as well.

Quite a lot of your commit messages are the same, so it's hard to distinguish between them. It would be better if this wasn't the case. I also noticed some commented out code that was left in there. In my opinion it would be best to remove it, but that's up to you.

I don't know if you've read this guide before, but if you didn't I would definitely recommend you check it out. Looking forward to seeing more of your contributions in the future!

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.

Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.

Thank you for your review, @amosbastian!

So far this week you've reviewed 5 contributions. Keep up the good work!

Hey, @semasping!

Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!

Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).

Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.

Vote for Utopian Witness!

Hi @semasping!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your post is eligible for our upvote, thanks to our collaboration with @utopian-io!
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.08
JST 0.041
BTC 29165.93
ETH 1835.94
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.46