Thanks for the review.

While searching for comments //It's easy to see that a lot of the code is repetitive. Is there no way to make this more modular?

Some of the configs created by users, who are not familiar with programming. I checked and validated the correctness of configs, but not improved the quality of the code. So now I have a problem with it - I think about how to improve the quality of hundred of configs. I working on it.

Machine generated code is not well looked upon for contributions. If it is needed, perhaps you could put it in a separate pull request and not include that in your utopian articles.

Which code is looked as machine-generated for you? :) Unfortunately, all commits are hand-made for now.