You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Bots and Manual Curation idea
I agree with the reasonable, technically knowledgeable folks who've already commented: it can't be done on the chain a while keeping it decentralized.
BUT I do have some ideas around this and I've been burning a lot of brainpower in the last months trying to figure it out. I think there in fact is a solution, but it has it's upsides and downsides. I'm not ready to reveal it but if any smart people want to contact me on Steemit.chat do help me figure it out I'd be much obliged.
I hope some do contact you mate as I think that there are solutions available without compromising the decentralised nature of the chain. This has been one of the most actively commented posts so far ;)
In a way, that should worry you and all of us. The sad truth is that there a large vocal caucus of users who would welcome increased restrictions on the chain in the service of various human-centric interests, who's supported methods I believe is misguided and I always argue against, even if their goals good in theory.
We should be suspicious of anyone who wants to take any inch of freedom away and ask until well answered: what is this in the service of? Is it justified?
Your concept reeks of the extremes of youth. Your mindset results in humans serving the greater AI overlord within not more than 50 years.
Sometimes common sense is a useful tool.
As a common sense suggestion - a Proof Of Stake system that was ninja mined by a lucky few, and is then subject to all the big whales running BOTS to maximize their share of future rewards pool, is NOT going to survive long term. It will turn into a whale circle jerk. And then slowly decline.
But that's just me and common sense.
I know that won't appeal to the purists who are their own decentralized autocrats and oligarths