Using Existing STEEM BlockChain Data to Create a Case Study for SMT’s

in #utopian-io6 years ago (edited)

With SMT’s on the horizon, many people are wondering how launching an SMT could fair out. After reading the SMT whitepaper, as a non-developer I was very disappointed. The entire paper was aimed at developers and it lacked basic information that the average website owner (like me!) would like to know.

As an average website owner that has already managed to monetize my website successfully there are many questions I have about SMT’s (and I already have a good understanding of Steemit, imagine the questions from people that never heard of Steemit or blockchain). But to try and workout in my own head how all of this could play out, I needed to create a case study.

Although there are ‘case studies’ in the whitepaper they do not really answer any of the questions I have. So the aim of this analysis is to create a case study backed by actual data from the Steemit BlockChain. The data used is based on DTubes actual account activity.

DTube is the decentralised version of YouTube, which has been created on the STEEM BlockChain by @heimindanger. This project has been financed by Steemit Inc. by way of delegation of 2M Steem Power.

One could view this delegation as fund raised or investment made on launch of the SMT.
Although DTube is not currently an SMT ( and I am not sure what their plans are) for the sake of this study we will assumed DTube to be a SMT with their token issued 1:1 at the value of STEEM. Therefore 2M Steem Power Delegation is 2M DTube SMTS. Let’s refer to this token as DTMT. (DTube Media Token).

We will also make the following assumption

• DTube went live on the 2nd Dec 2017 (this is the date the delegation was received)

• all DTMT’s went to the founder accounts (2M)

So what has DTube achieved since the 2nd December?

Usage Growth

image.png

From the 2nd of December 2017 to the 17 April 2018, 203k posts were made by 32.05K authors. These posts received 3M net votes and 285K comments. The comments were written by 44.22K authors and the comments received 190K net votes.

We can see in the chart showing the number of posts by date that on launch there was general growth in usage up to 30th Jan. Usage has since declined at a steady level.

DTube had organic traffic via its promotion on Steemit. There are currently approx. 80K unique active users on Steemit, over 900K registered accounts. That means there was over a 55% uptake of active steemit users to DTube. This is rather good considering Steemit content is generic and DTube is not for everyone. Many websites that may be interested in SMT’s would have a niche topic. Therefore you could expect uptake to be higher on these types of sites.

This can easily be compared to an average website with an email list or following of 80K people where the following is fully engaged with the content.

Let’s make some more assumptions. Let’s assume that DTube did not have this existing traffic and user based that Steemit gave and instead has an existing following or email list of 500K people.

Based on this and the data above, the uptake on comment participation is assumed to be 8.8% and for posting is assumed to be 6%.

This trend of initial growth can be linked with excitement of a new product within a current audience. The decline as seen in the charts above can be managed by applying a marketing strategy that ensures a continued flow of new users.

Founder Activity

In this case study, DTube has taken all the tokens at initial distribution. Initially this means that DTube must distribute rewards until other accounts grow their power. Lets take a look at the activity of the DTube account from the 2nd of December 2017 to the 17 April 2018

image.png

9390 votes were made to 2252 authors. That’s on average 69 votes a day at an average voting weight of 13.11%

DTMT’s Distributions

Based on the actual activity shown above for DTube on the Steemit BlockChain, we will now apply the assumptions to review the distribution implications of these activities.

As DTube is the only accounts with Power as per the assumptions above. Therefore a vote from DTube on launch was worth approximately 159.20 DTMT.

Taking this vote value, voting 69 times a day at 13.11% power we can calculate the rewards paid out in DTMT’s each day. This being split 75% author and 25% curator, we can now calculate the daily growth in DMTS’s for the founder by way of curation rewards and also the rewards paid to authors.
We will need to make the assumption that the founder account is optimized to maximize curation rewards and they do received 25% curation.

(Note these calculations to do take into consideration the changing price of STEEM which has an impact of the value of a vote)

When the founder account votes, they earn curation rewards, which increases their DTMT’s daily balance (as seen in the closing balance chart below). This in turn increase their vote worth, which then also impacts their curation rewards.

image.png

image.png

image.png

On the 2nd of Dec the founder started with an account of 2M DTMT’s and a vote of 159.20 DTMTS.
By the 17 April, the found account is now worth 2,047,447 M DTMTS. That equates to a 2.4% in just over 4 months and the value of a vote has increased to 163.27 DTMT’s.

In addition to the growth on the founder account as DTMT’s are distributed, Author rewards are also distributed. In turn as each author account grows their votes becomes worth more and the cycle of distribution continues.

We can see in the chart below in the 4 months the cumulative curation rewards distributed amount to 142,324 DTMT’s

image.png

US$

So far all this analysis has been based on the token DTMT’s. For the sake of this case study we will assume the price of DTMT’s remain at 1:1 with STEEM. By making this assumption we can take the STEEM prices and calculate US$ equivalents.

Let’s first look at the founders account

image.png

An Initial investment of 2M DTMTS costs $2.44M, however with curation rewards and the increase in the price of STEEM from $1.22 to $2.80 the total gain in 4 months would be 133%.

Contributors to the platform would also have gained in US$

Taking the author rewards and using the STEEM rate on the day, a total of $499,771 would have been paid out by the found to contributors.

Making an assumption that within the 4 months no one powers down, as the price of STEEM has moved considerably during the timeframe, the current value paid out to contributors and stored in power would be $398,558.

Conclusion

SMTs offer the possibility for you to tokenize your business. Based on actual data taken from the STEEM BlockChain for a live decentralised application and making certain assumptions we have been able to show what would be possible with an investment of $2.4M on a website with 500K users and am 8.8% uptake on adding contributions by comments.

There have been many assumptions made in this analysis and it is important to point out that any variation in these assumptions could make material differences in the results of this report.

While we have kept the price of STEEM and the sample token STMT’s stable at 1:1, the crypto market can be very volatile and gains or losses made by the price move.

This analysis does not address ICO valuation and a full risk assessment should be carried out before you make an investment. There is always the chance you could lose all of your money and this article is not to be taken as financial advice.

The study above represents my understanding of the SMT whitepaper coupled with my knowledge of how steemit works and is subject to assumption and a lack of full and comprehensive understanding on how SMT’s work.

The Data and the Queries

This analysis was carried out using actual activity data from the DTube account on the STEEM BlockChain.

The query used to get the activity growth was

SELECT
    author,
    created,
    children,
    Category,
    Depth
FROM comments (NOLOCK)
where 
contains (json_metadata, 'DTube')

The query used to get the found voting activity was

SELECT * FROM 
Txvotes (NOLOCK)
WHERE [voter] in ('DTube') 

Both of these tables were further filter to exclude all data before 2nd Dec 2017 and further calculations were done using DAX.

To get the actual STEEM US$ price I also connected the model to coinmarketcap data using the url
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/steem/historical-data/?start=20171201&end=20180417

Other reference: SMT Whitepaper https://smt.steem.io/



Posted on Utopian.io - Rewarding Open Source Contributors

Sort:  

Excellent analysis!

thank you br-real

I'm not sure that doing the analysis on a value-basis over a period where the underlying value of steem is going from a particular low to a relative recovery is reasonable.

It would be far more sensible and illustrative to simply describe the value in terms of megavests and leave reification into token value aside. After all, that's not really what's important and not within the control of a given SMT – unless they start tinkering with the exchange of value between STEEM and the particular token, which is certainly doable but in no wise is it easy to deal with.

So, speaking purely in terms of the mechanical issuance on the blockchain, what does the number of megavests look like over the same period?

(And also, assuming that DLive was engaging purely in DTMT votes, wouldn't those who received those votes be rewarded in DTMT, allowing their future votes going forward to be done in DTMT? Which brings up an entirely different question of if people with the notional DTMT were also previously active on the steem blockchain, would they then have two separate pools of reward that they could vote from? Will content created for SMTs not also appear on the core steem blockchain? If so, that's going to get really complicated really quick for quite a lot of people. What happens if I up vote a DTube video and I have no DTMT? Does my steem value get automatically translated into DTMT? Does it simply get denied, even though we are on the same blockchain? If SMT mechanics don't occur on the steem blockchain, where are they occurring?

There are just way too many questions about this sort of thing.)

there are a lot of questions and i really would like more communication on SMTs

STEEM was selected as the base currency because my understanding of the whitepaper says that SMT's will be traded against STEEM on the internal exchange and is the base currency.

Also when you explain to someone about steemit, it is difficult enough for people to get their heads around STEEM and SBD without trying to also explain mega vests.

at first I was under the impression that only ''summary' data would be sent to the steemit blockchain from the SMT's and to be honest i am still unclear on how it works. The whitepaper does say that STEEM witnesses will be responsible which suggests that everything will pass thought steemit.

Yes people that get votes from DLive will have power to also vote and give rewards and these rewards are not included in the above analysis

all the other questions you have asked I can not answer. I would love to see a focus group set up by Steemit inc to allows us ask the necessary questions. from talking with some others there is a lot of confusion and even some FUD being spread.

The SMT's are late anyway, i thought it was the end of Q1 for release....

I believe that we all thought it would be the end of Q1 for release. Apparently we were all wrong. Not the first time that I've had to make that particular announcement when it comes to this sort of thing, but it never feels better. I always expect that I should never expect things like this to come out on time.

Choosing STEEM as the base currency for your description was the right choice. That's absolutely the number that we should be kicking around. It's that last step where we sort of skip over the fact that rates of conversion are variable, even more variable than the internal value of the tokens in question, where I think the problem gets harder for us to actually explain.

Pegging things to SBD? Pretty much a recipe for people to completely misunderstand what you're talking about. Keeping to just STEEM and avoiding any appearance of a $? That's going to always be better – and will lead to the inevitable question which is best posed by whoever you're talking to, "so – how much is that actually worth in real money?"

That's where you get to talk about the fact that the value of an individual token of STEAM can vary pretty aggressively, but that is a secondary concern (for the most part) compared to just getting a handle on how the token itself will function.

I also received the belief that all SMT activity would be going through the steem blockchain and witness architecture, which made me wonder what SMT activity would look like on Steemit or Busy or chainBB, since they all backend for display on the steem blockchain itself. Will SMT transfers, posts, and even SMT-based communities be visible at an activity level on the steem blockchain? What will that even look like? Is it going to be comprehensible? Is that kind of traffic going to force those of us who have been using the steem blockchain through one of these pre-SMT interfaces to move off of them into smarter interfaces which know how to filter out SMT activity?

I really just want to know how we, as users, are supposed to be interfacing with this really huge change in the way that the entire architecture communicates in the open. What will it look like?

We don't get any real mockups of designs or processes for something so elemental and constantly a part of the process of engaging on the platform. That's the sort of thing that makes me more than a little skeptical and more than a little nervous.

I would love a focus group. At best, what I expect to see is a yes-man seated report from some far-off exotic location where everyone tells me repeatedly that "everything is fine," "there are some big players on board," "and we'll have more details when we get back from wining and dining exotic and beautiful women, shaking babies, and kissing hands." Nothing about actual process, how this thing is supposed to actually work for us, or anything that we can actually make use of.

I can imagine a dozen ways that SMTs could work. I'm sure none of them come close to the frustration I'll feel when I find out how SMTs do work.

But I want to know. This is kind of a big deal. We already have one SMT (or at least what pretends to be an SMT) in its final round of ICO (APPICS). As far as I can tell, we can't even answer the questions I just laid out when it comes to them, and we should be able to.

So I guess I get to be the token anti-hype guy or token-cynic guy or whatever it is I am around here in the community. I am pretty deeply dubious.

I think the APPICS ico has caused a lot of the confusion and FUD in the first place. Most of the main developers seem to know how its going to work, but for some reason it all seem hush hush to me after that. I have had my suspicions that this is being done on purpose to give existing top players an advantage over others, but that's a different conversation all together.

The assumption that we on the consumer side have kind of been driven to is that APPICS is going to be this entirely separate content world which is primarily focused on mobile devices. Which would be fine, except that an intelligent person then goes on to ask, "but what does that mean for the original steem blockchain?"

And then we cycle into all of the questions that I just asked previously about SMTs.

The APPICS ICO was interesting to me (not necessarily in a good way) because of the multistage nature of the release. The early phase had a 20% price cut and as things went along it dropped to 10% and then 5%. If I were trying to sell the most of the thing before a due date, that would be the exact opposite of what I wanted to do. I don't want to get everyone in at the beginning of my sales, I want to push them to get in right before the drop, keeping excitement high and word-of-mouth really solid once I go live. Instead, what they've done seems to communicate exactly the opposite, that they wanted everyone to get in early while the hype over nothing that they could see was high and then gently screw harder the people who came in via word-of-mouth or people who were excited to get in on a really cheap ICO (comparatively).

If we are to judge people by what they do and not what they say – what they do seems kind of shady.

And again with APPICS, we have a situation where they don't really talk much about the actual process of using the platform. They've given a few show and tells, but from the footage that I've seen, the actual interaction doesn't seem to be offering anything more than a very basic Instagram or Facebook post except that people can drop a steem vote on it. Hades only knows what their beneficiary cut is, or how their token will interact with the rest of the steem blockchain, or how their content will appear in the steem blockchain or anything else.

If they are spinning off a new token just to back a prettier mobile interface for the steem BC, I suppose that's okay, but it feels like a waste of an entire coin hype cycle.

One of the things that, as a game designer of multiplayer games and even role-playing games, I look at when considering whether or not to add a new currency to the game is whether or not you can buy something different with it. If you can't, there's no real reason for that extra bit of record keeping.

I know you've probably been following APPICS a lot more closely that I have, so if they aren't making much of an impression on you, I suspect that they're falling down on the job.

The SMTs are just not that impressive, useful, or needed, as far as I can tell right now. They almost feel as though they are a tacked on technology to compete with ERC20 – which would be fine if they actually conveyed an element of value like an ERC20.

Use cases. We need decent use cases. Ones which seem to be written from the position of "how will users actually use this thing?"

I'm not holding my breath. That never ends well.

I found you today the first time. I read your post about your proposal of the trending page. This analysis​ is great. Thanks for this content. Keep up the good work.

that was a old post now, maybe it time to re-visit, although we already know since that report, now trending is full of posts with paid votes

excellent analysis
thank you madam @paulag for helping us for this very interesting content.

That's a very interesting case study, @paulag! I must admit I didn't think much about how things will be with SMTs. But I'm happy to see (also in the comments) that I'm not the only one with more questions than answers :)
How did you chose the initial vote value of 159.20 DTMT? And does it also need the equivalent of SBD as token?


Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io.
Chat with us on Discord.

[utopian-moderator]

to calculate the initial vote value I used regression analysis @crokkon. I have the actual vote worth of Dtube on a number of dates, coupled with their SP levels and coinmarketcap data. So I used regression to work back the value of a vote based on 2M SP at the date of delegation. As there is a correlation between the value of a vote and the price of STEEM, regression can be used to work back.

As for your question on SBD, I do not know. Having read the whitepaper I cant see this, but as mentioned this whitepaper was written for developers and my lack of code knowledge means I may have missed some information.

When it comes to SMTs I also have more questions than answers, and as a small but profitable website owner, with so many unanswered questions and the level of difficulty in understanding what has been presented to us, I don't see me even considering implementing an SMT to my community of over 50K people. Part of the reason for this analysis was to try and get my own head around some of the aspects.

Hey @paulag! Thank you for the great work you've done!

We're already looking forward to your next contribution!

Fully Decentralized Rewards

We hope you will take the time to share your expertise and knowledge by rating contributions made by others on Utopian.io to help us reward the best contributions together.

Utopian Witness!

Vote for Utopian Witness! We are made of developers, system administrators, entrepreneurs, artists, content creators, thinkers. We embrace every nationality, mindset and belief.

Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.me/utopian-io

Your the best of analysis .!!

great analysis

I can see your analysis is sharp and touch the point @paulag, thank you

very good post and impressive once, frankly I really like to follow and read a very useful post like your post

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64420.25
ETH 3150.23
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.99