I completely agree with @emrebeyler.

You're now being defensive, you were explained what github and utopian.io actually are, how they differ and how they're not competitives. Accept that you're wrong.

Then you also say: "I think bountysource is only remotely similar to Utopian. Utopian is something totally new, and disruptive, in both concept and methodology." without giving much information. "I feel like this is shadow and pedantic". That's what you sound like.

Why is Utopian totally new, disruptive in both concept and methodology?

PS: You're the author of the article? @fknmayhem = @steemobserver ?