You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Utopian-io Voting Bot V3
Making it human would be good in some ways, but bad in others. This leads to more possibility of manipulation.
Additionally, moderators may not make consistent decisions. Leaving the work to a bot means there's nobody to 'blame' if your post got too much/too little of a vote, because everything's objective. Nothing's subjective.
You bring some good points though!
I thought just a little bit more human, not entirely human. Just one factor that the bot considers too.
That's a good idea! We may consider it for later development.
If multiple random mods would have to estimate and if individual estimates would be public, I think that manipulation risk would be manageable. This way, outlier estimation patterns could be easily detected and punished.