[eSteem Mobile] 2.0.7 [BUG] - Wrong Upvote Value Calculation / DisplaysteemCreated with Sketch.

in #utopian-io5 years ago

Project Information

Expected behavior

My expectation was that my actual upvote value would be displayed as the value specified.

Actual behavior

When logged in to the latest Version of the eSteem Mobile Application the Vote-Value of the current Logged in User may looks wrong. In my Test-Case it where a

100% Vote -> Voting with 0.00009 Value
but i think the correct Value that has to be on the Upvote Box should be like:
100% Vote -> Voting with 0.00032 Value
See the Screenshots. I have rechecked the Value of the Upvote by looking at the SteemWorld Entries for the Vote i have done on the eSteem App.

screenshot_20190123_133802_app esteem mobile

bildschirmfoto 2019-01-23 um 13 40 29

And as u can see here the Official Vote from SteemWorld is much higher as 0.00009
bildschirmfoto 2019-01-23 um 13 50 18

In this Example the User @louis.random has upvoted a Contribution of @louis88
Both: The Website steemworld and the App eSteem are set to show USD Prices.

How to reproduce

  1. Download the latest Version of the eSteem Mobile App from the Playstore
  2. Log in to your Account
  3. Go and Vote a Post
  4. A Slider is appearing where u can see the Vote Value
  5. Go and hit the Vote
  6. Check the Blockchain Entry with the Value that u have Upvoted
  • Device: Huawei Mate 10 Pro
  • OS: Android 9
  • Version of eSteem: 2.0.7 (latest)

Recording Of The Bug

Screenshots above

GitHub Account

https://github.com/louis88-steemit

Issue opened on Github: https://github.com/esteemapp/esteem-mobile/issues/495

Sort:  

Hi @louis88, thanks for making this contribution

Using my account, I was able to observe the behavior you described. The voting value shown at 100% is slightly different from the actual vote value. This constitutes a strange user experience as some users may want to know their vote value before scaling the voting weight on a post or comment.

My feedback:

  1. The steps you provided were easy to follow. The screenshots were helpful too.
  2. The actual behavior's text is meant to cover what exactly replaced the expected behavior. You should have moved your explanation of the bug to a different header. Also, next time try and cross check the post for speeling mistakes and grammar errors.
  3. You have not provided an analysis of the bug, neither have you proposed a fix. Are you aware that including the above can earn you extra points?:)

I hope this feedback helps in your subsequent reports :)

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.


Need help? Chat with us on Discord.

[utopian-moderator]

Thank you for your review, @fego! Keep up the good work!

Hi @louis88!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your post is eligible for our upvote, thanks to our collaboration with @utopian-io!
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Hey, @louis88!

Thanks for contributing on Utopian.
We’re already looking forward to your next contribution!

Get higher incentives and support Utopian.io!
Simply set @utopian.pay as a 5% (or higher) payout beneficiary on your contribution post (via SteemPlus or Steeditor).

Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.

Vote for Utopian Witness!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 64271.38
ETH 3157.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.25