If it were up to me, I would probably focus on a smaller number of broader categories, making it much easier to categorize things for the moderators, along with a certain understanding that open source projects and open source tools can work side-by-side with closed source materials, but I understand that the current establishment of Utopian emerged pretty much entirely from the software development side of the house and doesn't necessarily have a handle on all of the things that are "open source" related.

As an example that I was talking about to someone else, what about a tutorial which uses closed source software to target making assets for an open source game engine, but which the resulting game will be closed source? That's a perfectly reasonable workflow, and one that a lot of people could get significant use out of, but doesn't seem to fit into the current understanding of workflows that Utopian encompasses. Likewise, a tutorial for a closed source but freely available tool being used to advance an open source project which is not hosted on github? There is a lot of useful, important content which the structure of Utopian doesn't really have a way to grapple with, and yet would profit immensely from finding a way to integrate into the platform.

I appreciate the opportunity that you given me to talk about some of the things that seem to be a little problematic from my perspective as a creator. A tool like Utopian, that is a generalized mechanical means of establishing a community in the classic sense on the steem blockchain, is definitely something that we need to see more of and to see more widely used – but we need to be opening clear about the current limitations and why they are potentially seriously impeding doing some of the things that Utopian says they want to do.