You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Curation rewards you could have had - Calculating the best voting time sweet spot retrospectively
This is really interesting! Would you be willing to do this for my account (and for my projects @sneakyninja and @steembasicincome)?
Thank you so much!
sure, here are your graphs. The statistics for @josephsavage and @sneakyninja are a bit low, so don't draw too many conclusions on those.
In median @josephsavage is a few minutes too late, but also contains a few votes that came too early.
@sneakyninja hits the sweet spot pretty well for votes around the first 30 min, a few votes too late and only rarely too early.
@steembasicincome is interesting, there are almost no votes too early. In general it is however a couple of minutes too late. How does this bot vote - does this have a fixed voting time after a post is created?
Thanks @crokkon, this is very helpful.
To be honest, I care more about the statistics for @steembasicincome than for the other two, as different curation strategies are followed.
@steembasicincome uses steemvoter at specified delay to provide regular income to participants, through upvotes. Since optimizing curation rewards would help the program to deliver better results, we really appreciate this report. It looks like moving all the votes forward 2-3 minutes would make a nice improvement on curation rewards and give each participant a little more income.
I'm glad to see that you can make real use of this analysis!