You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Allow Authors To Determine Curation Split & Timing (Edit 30 Minute Delay)
You are right, however I think the compexity can easily be solved by adding a notification or a symbol (one that is more visible than the 100%), whether people get 100% curation rewards or 25%.
But I am not sure about the effectiveness of this.
I think curation is THE leading factor when it comes to the succes of Steemit as a platform. What makes Steemit really different compared to other social media platforms is the reward and incentive structure.
Theoretically this could lead to attracting the best of the best in terms of content creators, but I think that would only start to happen when curation becomes more important than post rewards and the parameters for curation would incentivize quality content upvoting. I do consider control over curation parameters an incredibly effective tool for authors to incentivize engagement and curation.
That is my main standpoint. Curation is the backbone of steemit. The balance between rewards for curating and for authoring, may be a bit imbalanced now.
Indeed, especially taking into account this rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1%25_rule_(Internet_culture)
Totally agree. This is why I keep posting on the curation topic!
Curie is an amazing microcosm of how effective curation can be.
Couldn't agree more with this.