Hello @fego,

Reading your summary post was a pleasant experience even though I noticed few inaccuracies which you corrected after notice. It is unfortunate that there was only one new contribution submitted during this week, also considering that the final score was 0.

I like that you add a short description of the experience with the new contributor and parts of the review, highlighting what was good and what was bad.

On the other hand, I believe that you could reorganise your summaries and put reviewed contributions in the week. That was one of the things I did not realise while reading the summary for the first time. I think that you could focus on posts that were reviewed and perhaps add a note about posts that are going to be reviewed in the following review week.

I believe that the current effort of the team should be put into expanding the current whitelist as it is still in effect. That could give people more options in submitting their reports and issues with particular projects. In that regard I would say that closer collaboration and organisation of planned testing cycles can be in place. What do you think about that?

Unlike other categories, you are sort of forced to include much longer time period to be able to compare the number of reviews.

I will include some issues I found still in the summary:

• Hunter Totals and Average
  • The chart says that data comes from the last 7 weeks. The complementary text, however, mentions 5 weeks.
• Weekly Average Score and number of Contributions
  • I'd prefer if you said that the contribution was scored 0 as you described at the top of the summary instead of writing that none was scored.

This post was reviewed and scored according to a simple set of metrics dedicated for the iamutopian category.

Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]