You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Python code to retrieve a user's vested share of Steem
Your contribution cannot be approved because it is not as informative as other contributions. See the Utopian Rules. Contributions need to be informative and descriptive in order to help readers and developers understand them.
Please check other contributions in the analysis category. These are usully full blown posts about a specific area of an open source project and not just scripts to extract data.
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Okay hopefully someday I'll get a post approved on Utopian. As someone who creates open source research as a profession, these rejections are a bit discouraging. Especially, since Utopian is still a 25% post beneficiary, so posting via Utopian and then getting rejected can be costly.
However, I appreciate the thoughtful moderation and will try at least one more time to post via Utopian. I wonder though if such strict moderation harms new user onboarding.
Hello @dhimmel, thanks for understanding. Since you know how to code, why not try creating a contribution under the development category?
Sounds good. I will make a development post next time. So to be clear, I should make the development post after a peer-reviewed pull request of mine has been merged into an open source repository? And the development post should describe the enhancement / bug fix?
Yes, that's the basic rule that we have. If it's not your project, and it's a new feature or it's a bug fix for an existing feature, then there's a high probability of it to be approved.
Again, I suggest to go through the rules of course.