You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Analysis of Voting "Spikes" on the Steem Blockchain
Thank you for the contribution. It has been approved.
From the data, I can tell that there are votes per second. Is this for a single post only? Or 600+ votes per second but on different posts. Without looking into the details, what I can infer is that users just want to get a big number of votes to go into the trending perhaps? But these number of votes were made by by a unique number of users? So I guess I also don't know what to conclude from it.
But I'd like to propose/suggest is, my impression here is that you're somehow looking for the bad guy/s. What I'd like to suggest is to analyze optimistically - look for the good guys and highlight them.
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
This is actually for a selection of 500 posts from January, but the numbers quoted (maximum of 66 votes per second) are for individual posts. It is true though, I think it would be very unfair to attempt to draw any firm conclusions from the data above.
That's an interesting angle! Highlighting strong curators could certainly be beneficial!
Hey @eastmael, I just gave you a tip for your hard work on moderation. Upvote this comment to support the utopian moderators and increase your future rewards!