You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is Steeditor the best tool for utopian contributions? (Review of Steeditor and comparison with steemplus and utopian.rocks extension)
This is a very thoughtful and comprehensive review, well researched and well illustrated. While I don't find the template selection in Steeditor to be a hardship, and have setup multiple templates of my own, I realize user experiences can differ.
The post was a bit let down by issues of style, grammar, and proofreading. I would recommend that you make an effort to write as simply and clearly as possible.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Thanks for your review. I used grammarly to review the content. It's surprising it's still rated poorly. I guess the fact that I'm not purely an Englishman plays a part too. Because if the text is reviewed by someone in my country he'd say it's perfect.
Thanks for your review anyway.
Thank you for your review, @didic! Keep up the good work!