RE: Weekly overview of the bug-hunting category- week 49, 2018
This post was tremendously informative, with detailed information about the category and the contributions to it.
However, it had quite a few issues of style, grammar, and proofreading, making it occasionally difficult to read. There were some places where I had to guess from context what you meant to write. While we judge #iamutopian posts differently from regular Blog category posts, the basic requirement of writing carefully and well is still present. I would really like to see more of an emphasis on this in future weekly reports.
Thanks for the contribution. I really did appreciate the effort.
Please note that while I haven't changed the footer, I am not scoring #iamutopian posts based on the questionnaire. They have their own metric, and that will be the case until we go live with the new guidelines and new questionnaire, which will be comprehensive enough to reflect these types of posts.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
@didic, thanks for the review. It will be of great help if you point out to me where I erred, especially on the issues of style and grammar
Of course. Here are some examples:
This could work as:
"@blockchainstudio is a first-time contributor to the category. He noticed the SBD print rate was still at 1%."
Or:
"@blockchainstudio, a first-time contributor to the category, noticed the SBD print rate was still at 1%."
What was it supposed to be? Perusing?
The missing comma after FAQ is very confusing.
You can't talk about and to a person in the same sentence. A period after "category" would have been very helpful.
Thank you for your review, @didic! Keep up the good work!