RE: Structural change analysis of KR Community
Hi @lostmine27, very impressive analysis of the KR community! Seems like the KR community is doing pretty well, and the comparisons with all Steem give a great context to your results! I haven't heard of manamine before - what is it about and is there an English description available?
While I personally like your work very much, the topic unfortunately does not fit very well with the scope of Utopian, where analyses (in the best case) can help the owner of the open source project in decision making. Based on the current Utopian guidelines, "analyses of social and behavioural changes of a specific group involved in the project will be not be considered for potential reward." For an analysis of all Steem, the KR community is a very vital part, but still a subgroup, and it's not an open source project on its own. If you have questions on the scope of Utopian, feel free to contact us/me on Discord!
Nevertheless, I'm sure the KR community benefits a lot from your work and I'm looking forward to the seconds part!
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Dear @crokkon,
I wanted to reflect on the entire STEEM through the past and present of the KR community, as I saw that the KR community had the Testbed character of STEEM.
However, I fully understand your decision that this report is closer to analyzing a particular subgroup of STEEM in accordance with the guidelines.
I will think more about Utopian's scope and find ideas to try new things.
Thank you. Have a good time.
Thank you for your review, @crokkon! Keep up the good work!