You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Curation Earnings Analysis (with stats and thoughts on 50 / 50 curation system proposal)
Stupid to change anything. The users just need to change their behavior or suffer the consequences more. They will learn one day or new users will come in that learn. Read the whitepaper people. Also miniature-tiger you are in the N-Person Prisoner’s Dilemma.
Eight months ago, 35% of votes made were purchased from bid-bots. I do not want to think what the level is now. On top of this there are circle votes, self-votes, vote-swapping. It's not much of a prisoner's dilemma if you already know that most people are just going to act in their own best interest.
The proposal I put forward tries to work with that knowledge, potentially allowing all users to contribute positively to Steem using the dPoS voting mechanism to get the best content to the top of trending, whilst taking the proportion of their own SP generated inflation that they believe is appropriate in rewards.
"It's not much of a prisoner's dilemma if you already know that most people are just going to act in their own best interest." That is exactly what it is. You think others are gonna act a certain way so you act a certain way and we all go down. If people really wanted to act in their own self interest they would educate themselves and follow the Law of Steem. lol Read the whitepaper.