[Busy.org] - Search is taking to steemit.comsteemCreated with Sketch.

in #utopian-io7 years ago (edited)

This was a bug posted regarding Busy.org on Github.com. The discussion can be considered as a good record of how the moderators of Utopian.IO is working to make things better. Wishing all the success to Utopian.io team.

To understand more about Utopian and Opensource (FOSS), check the informative post by @stellabelle below

Could Utopian.io Become The Ultimate Funding Solution For Open Source Projects?

2017-11-12_07-14-25.png


This was a bug posted regarding Busy.org on Github.com. The discussion can be considered as a good record of how the moderators of Utopian.IO is working to make things better. Wishing all the success to Utopian.io team.

The heading is kept to keep the original content there additional edits are made above to avoid confusion. Non-technical audience can ignore the following content.


Expected behavior

  1. IMHO the search results should displayed within the busy.org interface even if we are using Google Custom Search.

  2. The search results should take us to the corresponding busy.org URL as opposed to steemit.com URL

Actual behavior

  1. Right now we are taken to a new tab
  2. The new tab shows google search results
  3. The links are pointing to steemit.com (this can be fixed by site:busy.org or with a google custom search engine ?)

https://www.screencast.com/t/XTPk57pby

How to reproduce

  1. go to busy.org
  2. input a keyword into the search box and search
  • Browser: Firfox Nightly 58.0a1 (2017-11-11) and Firefox 57 Beta
  • Operating system: macOS
  • busy.org is running in a Firefox container for steem & Google is search in a container for Google search



Open Source Contribution posted via Utopian.io

Sort:  

Hi, your contribution can't be approved. We have already accepted a similar post. See the Utopian rules.

Never Submitted Before
Contributions must be unique. Users must look first if the same or very similar contribution has been submitted. A moderator will check if the contribution has been reported before and won't accept it in the Utopian feed again if so.

Bug Hunting Category
Contributions under this category must include all the possible information for reproducing the bug. Devices, Internet connection speed, Browser version and similar info are necessary to reproduce the submitted bugs. Contributors should look if the bug has been reported on the project's GitHub repository.

https://github.com/busyorg/busy/issues/975

You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]

ok and this report will not be merged and marked as a duplicate of 975 ? thats normally how things are handled in the open source and free software communities. just curious.

Also this comment this meantions additional issues

  1. firefox container scenarios
  2. OS is not specified in the other issue (though it will be common everywhere)
  3. The original project, is busy has asked for some guidelines - which is not followed.

I am not complaining, just trying to understnd how the utopian platform will scale and moderate to work for projects like Linux kernel where the moderators not necessarily understand kernel functionalities.

I can suggest you to report it on GitHub but this is not a bug. They implemented it that way temporarily. So it doesn't depend on OS nor Browser. If you have questions how the synchronization between Utopian and GitHub works, you need to ask @elear.

If you do not agree you can also ask him and he can change my decision.

https://utopian.io/utopian-io/@sirrius/busy-org-beta-testing-5-ux-suggestions-and-feature-requests

[utopian-moderator]

In the open source (non GPL, BSD) world and GPL (free software world) every contribution is to be counted and accounted for IMHO. I do respect your decision. I was wondering how this model will work going forward. For example IMHO a better method is to merge the two bugs on github and I did that here (https://github.com/busyorg/busy/issues/1070 ). If the moderators are not allowing the content / bug / idea to be posted onto github or a similar platform (say Gitlab, Phabricator) then the suggestions will be lost. I was just saying that / suggesting that Utopian must need to find a way to address this. Now its you - me and the STEEM world and we tend to agree and co-operate ... outside world can be arguMENTAL :)

You see, you made a mistake. You submitted an issue on GitHub and then posted it here. If you have the accounts synced, then there would be another issue with the same content.

The Utopian is being developed and you can see that not everything works perfectly but taking the reward for granted is off the table. If the moderator doesn't approve your contribution on Utopian it doesn't mean that you cannot submit it yourself on the repo later if you think that they really need to know about it.

Of course moderators here do not know about every possible project out there but we decide which posts will get the vote according to the rules. And because of that I told you that this cannot be accepted on Utopian.

You see, you made a mistake. You submitted an issue on GitHub and then posted it here. If you have the accounts synced, then there would be another issue with the same content.

Where ? I think I am missing something here.

The Utopian is being developed and you can see that not everything works perfectly but taking the reward for granted is off the table.

That was not the intention. If that was the case I would not be contributing to Free Software for last 18 years as it never gave me any financial contribution. I was contributing to busy just like any project and when I saw I thought of extending the support to utopian as well. (I didn't actually wanted the content to be posted on to Steemit.com as its more of a curated content that I plan to post here)

another issue with the similar content where ?

Of course moderators here do not know about every possible project out there but we decide which posts will get the vote according to the rules.

But, the issue of the content which was supposed to be on Github not present in github still remains.

A better model could have been to post it without the rewards/earning and have the github project owner say, @fabien close the issue as a duplicate one.

note that I am not at all considered about this being accepted or not, I am trying to understand the workflow better @espoem :)

A better model could have been to post it without the rewards/earning and have the github project owner say, @fabien close the issue as a duplicate one.

This is not possible as of now. If I approved it, you would get the reward.

another issue with the similar content where ?

You submitted an issue on GitHub. If this post was approved then it would be pushed to the GitHub issues so there would be two issues by you with the same content.

This is not possible as of now. If I approved it, you would get the reward.

understood.

You submitted an issue on GitHub. If this post was approved then it would be pushed to the GitHub issues so there would be two issues by you with the same content.

Yea! that my mistake. I got confused with the utopian interface.

Thanks for the time and efforts @espoem

Congratulations @bobinson! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes received

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

great post, as usual!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63207.55
ETH 2571.17
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.82