RE: steemrewarding.com - curation performance is shown and other improvements
Wow this project is really going well. I have my own bots, but I'd like to try this.
btw, I have some questions. As far as I know, you also manage sbi. SBI also uses some ranking like steem-ua or is it purely based on their points? While I still don't fully understand the system nor philosophy, it seems a very well-made system.
Re steem-ua, previously there was a "bug" such that it sometimes voted utopian post as a regular post if the author delegated. (so kind of disadvantage). Is this still true? I think it happens if regular steem-ua cycle just comes before the cycle for utopian.
This is totally unrelated, but Are you using some tools to create this post? especially for commits section? I actually copied your style for my first dev post, but that commit section was very time-consuming to me. Hope there is easy way to create at least commit link. Many thanks!
SBI is purely based on units each member has. More units -> higher upvote. I'm not managing it, I have programmed the automation for it.
No, I'm doing it by hand. It is time-consuming, I will think of a way to automate this :), it should be possible to read out commit messages and github links.
Thanks a lot for your replies. I'm actively using beem too together with official library. I'd really appreciate that. I've added a question about steem-ua you might have missed. Thanks!
btw, I've just voted you for witness. I wanted to do it long time ago, but you didn't answer to my questions related to beem before three times in a row, basically never :) I'm not a kid, but two things I think very important as witness is communication and (in my case, dev, but this is just personal taste, I don't think this is must). So I wanted/had to follow my philosophy though I felt guilty to use your beem :) Now I'm very happy that I voted you for witness and looking forward to seeing your exciting projects. thanks!
You can also just create a pull request and link that instead, it saves a lot of time!
Thanks for your advice! Will do that way next time though @holger80's style looks very cool :) By the way, what's the min num of commits for utopian dev? I try to gather more, but sometimes, PO doesn't merge often. Since I'm external contributor, this may lead to just one commit for a 14 day window.
While I expected that if latest one is within 14 day, even passed one should be fine, but it seemed not based on the review for my submission.
There is no minimum (apart from 1 I guess, lol). As for the time limit rule: if it's a pull request it's within 14 days of it being merged. If commits aren't part of a pull request, then it's 14 days from them being committed.
Thanks a lot! I have a clarifying question though. I'm not a PO. Is it still okay to submit PR that hasn't been merged? If this isn't allowed, I may end up with one commit in some cases due to infrequent/irregular merging by PO.
Sorry for the late reply, I somehow completely missed this! As for your question, you are correct in saying that a PR must have been merged, so unfortunately this means that in the case of irregular merging by a PO there could be a problem. However, we try to use common sense and be a bit lenient towards stuff like this, so it's always worth asking us beforehand if you have any doubts!
No problem and thanks a lot for your answer. Yes, it should be lenient :) Thanks!