RE: Utopian bot VP analysis - 2 more rounds are available per year :)
Hi @abh12345, thank you for your review and comments. Regarding LLN, it's so simple. If the cronjob runs the bot every 5 minutes, what's the average? 2.5 mins. That's all! Of course, sometimes it could be very close to 5 or 0 as you said. But on average it should be 2.5 if we have enough datd, which is the case here. If it's longer than 5 mins, it was at least 26 minutes, so I'm pretty sure that the current cronjob runs every 5 minutes. Please let me know if you have any more question.
I also have one suggestion. In general, I'd prefer some analysis not many people want to do on their own :) Because, if it's a popular topic for everyone, someone will do anyway :) So people like me already know that it's a narrow scope, but may still quite interesting and have values to some people. So you don't need to say "quite a narrow scope" in the comment explicitly :) I'm absolutely fine with a lower score due to that, but it can be done just with the scoring system not by comments. Of course I know that you're using that word to guide contributors, so no worry about it and thanks a lot for your suggestion.
p.s. I see your post linked has been rewarded :)
I think you saw my suggestion post, the post in danger (and now it's gone for sure) was a dev post which had quite a decent amount of jobs: - Busy - 3 new features and 2 bug fixes - powerdown information, zero payout, 3-digit precision, etc But actually many dev posts couldn't get rewarded this week. Feel free to vote my dev post if you're using Busy :) Thanks again!
Ah I see, LLN quite straight-forward :) It was this part of the chart that seemed so show large swings, and I was wondered if the previous delay had influence on the next delay.
I understand your suggestion, but as you say, we score the contributions based on a questionnaire, and one of the criteria involves scope. So I would rather mention this to provide other readers with information on the review/reward. For this part of the questionnaire, it's not really a question of 'popularity of topic'.
However, I will try to word reviews more positively in future, as I do appreciate every contribution to the category and don't want to scare anyone away!
Sorry your other work missed a reward, I was indeed looking at the wrong post :(
Thanks a lot again for your comment! Yes, I agree that that part looks not so random, but I think it's another randomness of randomness. lol
And yes, I understand that. Especially for the first-time contributor, you should better inform them for improvement. Hope you could remember me even if I made another narrow-topic post :) so you could use more positive wording with low score behind the scene. haha. Thanks!
lol
I would rather make the comment and try to give the best score possible - that's the approach I've taken the past year and it seems to have worked, so far! :D
:D haha thanks!