You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Utopian bot VP analysis - 2 more rounds are available per year :)

in #utopian-io7 years ago (edited)

Hi @abh12345, thank you for your review and comments. Regarding LLN, it's so simple. If the cronjob runs the bot every 5 minutes, what's the average? 2.5 mins. That's all! Of course, sometimes it could be very close to 5 or 0 as you said. But on average it should be 2.5 if we have enough datd, which is the case here. If it's longer than 5 mins, it was at least 26 minutes, so I'm pretty sure that the current cronjob runs every 5 minutes. Please let me know if you have any more question.

I also have one suggestion. In general, I'd prefer some analysis not many people want to do on their own :) Because, if it's a popular topic for everyone, someone will do anyway :) So people like me already know that it's a narrow scope, but may still quite interesting and have values to some people. So you don't need to say "quite a narrow scope" in the comment explicitly :) I'm absolutely fine with a lower score due to that, but it can be done just with the scoring system not by comments. Of course I know that you're using that word to guide contributors, so no worry about it and thanks a lot for your suggestion.

p.s. I see your post linked has been rewarded :)

I think you saw my suggestion post, the post in danger (and now it's gone for sure) was a dev post which had quite a decent amount of jobs: - Busy - 3 new features and 2 bug fixes - powerdown information, zero payout, 3-digit precision, etc But actually many dev posts couldn't get rewarded this week. Feel free to vote my dev post if you're using Busy :) Thanks again!

Sort:  

Ah I see, LLN quite straight-forward :) It was this part of the chart that seemed so show large swings, and I was wondered if the previous delay had influence on the next delay.

I understand your suggestion, but as you say, we score the contributions based on a questionnaire, and one of the criteria involves scope. So I would rather mention this to provide other readers with information on the review/reward. For this part of the questionnaire, it's not really a question of 'popularity of topic'.

However, I will try to word reviews more positively in future, as I do appreciate every contribution to the category and don't want to scare anyone away!


Sorry your other work missed a reward, I was indeed looking at the wrong post :(

Thanks a lot again for your comment! Yes, I agree that that part looks not so random, but I think it's another randomness of randomness. lol

And yes, I understand that. Especially for the first-time contributor, you should better inform them for improvement. Hope you could remember me even if I made another narrow-topic post :) so you could use more positive wording with low score behind the scene. haha. Thanks!

lol

I would rather make the comment and try to give the best score possible - that's the approach I've taken the past year and it seems to have worked, so far! :D

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.10
TRX 0.32
JST 0.033
BTC 110431.51
ETH 4049.40
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.64