RE: Proposal for New 'Promoted' Function
Ok, I get it. So based on those whom I already follow and posts that I usually look at, like food and gaming, those types of promoted posts will show up in my feed. That works.
Exactly!
Well, we can't say that everybody uses the Upvote Services, unless we're including the free ones. I can say that for myself, Upvote bots don't interest me, and I kind of started taking pride in the fact that my account is growing organically, with humans behind my upvotes.
I don't include free ones, as a matter of fact, even services like @qurator are pretty much fine by me. It is really the bigger players like @booster, @buildawhale, which, like I've said, I don't think poorly of them at all, both @frystikken and @markymark are doing great services for the community, it just so happens that their services are negatively affecting the ecosystem is all.
Now that I understand better, I think this promoted thing will help a bit, but I'm not sure it will remove the Upvote Service habit that people have. There needs to be something, perhaps included with this new promoted system, to not only entice people to want to use the Promoted service rather than the upvote bot, but to also make them NOT want to use those bots. Something that will truly make people be like "Ok, no more bots."
Maybe after an initial transition period, where people start to use more the promoted service, bots will slowly die down, but maybe they won't and not much will have changes. So something needs to be figured out to help steer people in the direction that is away from these bots.
I believe when users are provided a system far superior to the existing one, it is only natrual that they start to move away from the inferior one. The additional fact of where the money is going will tip the scale even faster.
You know, I was talking about our exchange to my husband and Frank said something interesting, he suggested we find a way so that if bots do continue to exist that they scan content, based on reputation, previous posts, key words, and such, so that the bot does not upvote content with less than a certain number of words, and content that it not worthy of an upvote. I wonder how that can actually be possible, but something like that could also help. Not that I want bots to stay, but the main problem I see with bots is that they don't have a way to check the content and so anything gets upvoted. It tough to see how such a change to bots could be implemented or even possible, but it's a thought.
However, personally, I do prefer no bots. If this new promoted thing makes people stop using bots altogether, then bots will have to find something else and they will die out. Until they come up with something superior and then something else needs to be done to remove them. It could be never ending, but hey, that's part of trying to improve.
And we're going to need a new page soon before the Steemit reply system has our replies down to one word per line LOL ;)