You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: WritCoin - Creative Proof of Brain
I like reading blog posts like this. More of an idea than, this is what I have read or what I know :)
To an extent this mechanism would be self regulating as plagiarists/spammers would be unlikely to want to buy a token with their ill gotten steem if content creators are going to be under review before being accepted into the writers community. In this scenario community candidates would have to be vetted based on past content and reputation on steemit.
This seems like it would fit well with the idea of a 'good person' token, or a 'good writer' token. To prove this is the case, you need a history, some credentials, as it were.
Thanks for sharing the idea, I hope others contribute also.
Thanks for the feedback @abh12345
Yeah, I did think that regulating this would be the most challenging aspect. Maybe not right now as steemit is quiet and I feel like I know around 30-40 names who wouldn't even need reviewing as their writing speaks for itself, but if it were as busy as it were in November last year it would take some serious work to keep the scammers out. It is the part of the idea that I haven't puzzled out completely yet.
The idea was that people would have to hold the SMT token as a stake to be part of the community, which is part of how it would regulate, but to keep the community relevant as a creative writers hub it would probably need manual verification of each new member. Kind of like what we have to do as curie curators, vet work for quality, plagiarism, genuine account confirmation etc.
Anyway, sowing seeds at the moment. Lets see what grows :-)