RE: Curation Earnings Analysis (with stats and thoughts on 50 / 50 curation system proposal)
Thank you for this excellent analysis contribution to @utopian-io - a well deserved staff pick this week :)
This on-going debate always sparks interest, I know trafalgar and kevinwong are keen on 50/50 (with a couple a tweaks to the the curve on top) and so it's good to see some research into what the numbers would look like if the model was changed.
With a portion of the curation % going back to the pool following the last fork, it's interesting to see that we are looking at more like 20% for the curators. Are we heading in the wrong direction here?!
As always, excellent presentation and conclusions, and a summary of thoughts and ideas worth a few posts themselves I think. 'Flat curation' seems like something to put more brain time into, and is perhaps one to explore with an SMT.
I'm also happy to see some excellent discussion in the comments, and good on you for responding with some detailed points there too.
A pleasure to review!
Asher
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
Thanks Asher!
If implemented without the curation slider, "flat curation" would remove the need for the 15 minute period and there would be no curation sent back to the reward pool. People could vote when they wanted and all voters would move back to the "headline" 25% curation rate (on each vote, and overall as long as they voted efficiently).
However it wouldn't solve the issues with bid-bots and trending and getting the best content recognised, which I think is the more important question to solve.
Thanks for the review!
Thank you for your review, @abh12345! Keep up the good work!