You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Curation rewards you could have had - Calculating the best voting time sweet spot retrospectively
Pretty sure biophil has a trail and his own bot engine.
Could you say that because of this he is creating the voting sweet-spot for the post?
miniature has been hunting utopian-io posts that will take a nice up-vote from their bot - you have hours/days in hand there as you know.
not sure on bugged-out but i think he would be interested see that a minor change to his technique could pay (more!) dividends.
Sweet post!
First of all, thanks for the warm words, the resteem, the vote (at a probably well-paying position) and the approval!!!
Curie certainly creates its own sweet spot, but I'm not sure about biophil. He wouldn't have to vote before 30 mins with a reasonable trail in hand.
Keep in mind that this analyzes only the position of the votes and not the selection of the posts. You can still have pretty poor curation rewards while voting at the exact optimal position because the selection of posts or vote-% is wrong.
No problem, really great work!
I switched all my autos to 15 minutes a few weeks ago, but this morning (honestly!) I changed 99% of them to 24 minutes. I'm pretty sure that analysing @abh12345 would show i'm voting too early (my rewards have halved!)
Are you only running the analysis on top level comments? If not, @zapncrap would be interesting :)
Understood, cheers!
seems like you have a spread of too-early and too-late votes around the optimal time for @abh12345:
sorry, I'm only running on top level comments a.t.m.
For the autos: did you check the actual voting times? I noticed streemian being around 2 minutes late in my case, which can make quite a difference.
I'm running Steemvoter and it has been very hit and miss recently.
May request a 7 day view in a weeks' time to see if that's improved anything.
Cheers!!