I agree with the good.

Disagree with the bad outcome because while there might be elements of truth within it, I think there's alot to be said for the power of personal responsibility. Regardless of what agendas might be going down in the back halls of government and politics, every citizen with internet access has the capability to educate themselves and create opportunities to adapt to the unfolding of change, regardless of whether it's driven by "an elite" or not. So while there might be validity to the "Bad" side, I don't see any purpose in pointing fingers and labelling it as such, because ultimately, citizens who lazily wait around to be provided for bring it upon themselves should they get fucked in the end, as they could have been hustling to stay ahead of the curve instead of watching TV and expending their time and energy in non-constructive outlets.

And the flipside with some potential good, were the bad to go down - maybe the world would be better with the stupid, lazy, self-entitled, extreme fundamentalists, and non-contributors to society wiped out. Maybe that'd even be necessary for human evolution, if there actually is something to the "survival of the fittest" theory. So who knows - maybe even the "bad" could be serving some "good" in the larger context, were the "bad" actually as painted...