Nobody Wants to Admit to the Real Reasons Behind American Mass Shootings

in truth •  8 months ago

There was “mass casualty event” at an American high school yesterday that took the lives of 17 students, and I’m unfortunately not surprised at this point. Mass shootings have become commonplace in America as of late, and after every one of them, the political blame game spins round and round, even before we send out our redundant “thoughts and prayers.”

We have to ban guns. No, we need more guns. We need to put more police in public places — and even in schools to deter shooters. We need to ban gun-free zones. We need to blame all right-wingers. We need to blame all left-wingers. We need to call white violence terrorism. We need to blame psychotropic drugs. We need to ban Muslims. We need to (insert your reactionary opinion here).

Everybody thinks they know what’s wrong, but it seems nobody wants to acknowledge the plainly obvious reasons behind all this violence…

Violence is Inherent to American Identity


America is violent by default. It’s in our DNA as a nation. Born out of the exploitation and genocide of Natives and built off the backs of slaves, the United States has used violence to solve its “problems” since its inception. The country’s independence, itself, was obtained through years of violence — the American revolution. This violence is now venerated and enshrined in popular American mythology and perpetuated ad nauseam in public school history books.

The violence never stopped, and it has been routinely glorified. When Native Americans had something we wanted, we murdered them and took it — over and over again. America’s deft use of violence in World War II became our modern claim to moral superiority. The invasion of Iraq decades later was deemed a gift to Iraqi citizens despite the countless deaths and destruction of their homeland that came with it.

We memorialize those who commit violence for the government and hold them in the highest esteem — throwing tantrums when others express dissenting opinions or fail to bow to the people who serve these institutions.

When children misbehave, we beat them. When people don’t follow the ever-expanding number of (many times unjust) laws in the U.S., we jail them. When a country does something we don’t like, we bomb them and overthrow their government. When a leader does something the U.S. government doesn’t like, we assassinate them. Even what should be civil political discourse has been radicalized into violent rhetoric — the war on women, the war on Christmas, the war on healthcare, the war on cops. War permeates our culture.

Therefore, it’s only natural that when a person is sad, down on themselves, off their meds, or mad about something, picking up a gun to solve their problems with violence seems to be logical. Our government does it, why not them? We beat kids for being “bad,” why would they not use violence against adults? Our government bombs schools in countries we don’t like, so what is so different about an individual getting a gun and shooting up a school in the United States? Our police shoot and kill over 1,000 Americans every year, often because they are afraid of them or because they “did not comply.” Is it any surprise that many of the most atrocious mass shootings in this country were committed by individuals with a fetish for militarism (or policing institutions)? Likewise, Nikolas Cruz, the Florida high school shooter, was a member of the JROTC — an American youth military training organization — and reportedly a member of a Florida white nationalist militia.

Thanks in large part to our government, American society assumes violence solves problems, whatever those problems may be. Since this country’s founding, America has been dehumanizing others and committing mass acts of violence against them in the name of what is “right” or “good.” The Virginia shooter probably thought he was committing a righteous act by shooting a Republican who was taking away his healthcare.

Just as the concept of “Manifest Destiny” made room in early Americans’ consciences to rationalize genocide against the natives — and the post 9/11 dehumanization of Muslims allows for the ongoing war on terror, which has taken well over one million innocent lives — we now dehumanize others for disagreeing with us politically to the point where violence is becoming a regular occurrence.

The “us vs. them” nationalism that was previously used as propaganda during major wars to get the public unified behind international conflicts has now come home to roost. The next logical step is to get out the guns and start shooting our political opponents down in the street — and now, apparently, it’s happening. And I’m not surprised.

Problem, Reaction, Solution and Well-Intentioned Political Violence


There is another reason violence is such a default reaction, and it extends beyond the behavior and nationalism perpetuated by the U.S. government. In most of the public’s reactions to the problem of mass shootings, there is a hint of violence in their subsequent well-intentioned proposals to legislate away said violent acts.

Taking away someone’s right to do something is an act of violence — political or otherwise. In the United States, we have a tendency to enact laws against things we don’t like, and if someone still does something politicians say is bad, violence is committed against them in the form of punishment, fines, incarceration, and execution. After all, government is defined by its ‘moral’ exemption to use violence — if a soldier, cop, or other government agent commits violence at the behest of politicians or ‘the law,’ it’s in the name of the greater good — regardless of whether or not it’s actually moral. If members of the public use violence, they’re criminals, even if they also believe they’re advocating a ‘greater good.’

So when you say armed guards should be put into every school, you’re endorsing an act of violence by taking someone’s tax money and spending it in a way they may disagree with. When you say “guns should be banned,” you are advocating violence by taking away someone else’s freedom because you think that particular liberty is dangerous, outdated, or arcane. Your desire to remove that freedom necessarily requires the use of violence on the part of armed government agents confiscating the gun or locking them up for failing to obey the edict.

That’s fine and dandy until the freedoms you hold dear end up in the crosshairs of political moralists who feel they know better than you. The slippery slope that starts with banning guns because they can be used for violence can slide into banning books because dangerous information can lead to dangerous thoughts or violence.


When a culture of violence intersects with an inherently violent government, I’m not surprised that Americans of all political persuasions are shooting each other in the streets and in schools. So perhaps instead of reforming gun laws or turning our schools into fortresses, America needs to take a long hard look in the mirror. From the way we treat our children to the global war on terror, if we truly want to stop the spread of violence, maybe it’s time to admit that violence has been ingrained into every aspect of our society and do something about that.

WATCH NEXT: Florida Student Says She Talked to Nikolas Cruz During the High School Shooting


Written by Nick Bernabe

Opinion / Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a typo


antimedia

The Homepage of Independent Media


| Steemit | Facebook | Instagram |

| Twitter | YouTube | Google+ |





Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I have mixed feelings about your post but I agree with most of your opinions. Especially the aspect of America and its relationship with violence. But has any country ever accomplished anything without some form of violence or the other at some point. The Florida shooting is an unfortunate episode but not every American is a trigger happy psychopath with a host of mental problems. If they were, everyone or at least a significant number of individuals in that school would have been armed and ready to shoot back at monsieur Cruz

Rule by force is the disease, who and how are symptoms, love is it's cure.

Our first, and most persistent, rule in life is do as you are told, or violence.

Great article

I mentality needs to change. Even if one ban guns, it is still going to be used. Isn't cocaine banned? Yet still sold and bought. When mentality is right, things get right. I remember i read, a police officer killed a citizen in Iceland year or two ago, still the country mourned for the death and in shock aa it was first incident at the time. Things get better only when you change the mentality.

Loading...

Banning guns or deploying armed forces won't solve the problem. I don't think high-school students or middle-aged men commit violence like this spontaneously.

Somebody who kills random people or himself or both can do that when he has no hope left from anybody, society, system, family, friends, etc.

Leave aside politicians, corruption and violent history. I feel it is about general people.

·

There is no "problem" - unless We count the fact that the psychopaths in control on Our planet, who create these psyops and sell them to Us as "reality," are a problem. Which I consider Them to be. I would solve for psychopaths in control, and if You would too, I invite You to watch the playlist I have on YouTube. Do watch on YT, as only the first vid plays here. (The whole list is less than 1 hour's worth of vids):

·
·

What's new about it? Genghis Khan, Sultans of Delhi, Alexander, Colonialists, Many Knights, Many Samurais n I don't know how many warlords have killed zillions of people & shaped the history of the world.

A person who kills one person is a murderer.
A person who take assignments for killing is a hitman, soldier or sepoy.
A person who kills random people is a psychopath.
A person who kills too many people and cause a lot of destruction is a terrorist.

Which army in the world does't kill millions of people?

All the armies are backed by their community morally, financially, emotionally and every possible way.

A person who kills or orders to kill millions of people is a warlord, king or emperor.

The world is not good, neither bad, it's not accurate to call it any of the two.

Psychopaths who kill random people on the street don't come from the Mars. Cancer has its roots within the body(Society). When the DNA inside of the nucleus of a normal, healthy cell gets altered in a bad way, it starts killing cells around it. Though, previously, it was exchanging resources and wastes with all of them.

The negative thought processes are like dysfunctional DNA. Why exactly somebody thinks in a negative fashion, it's too difficult to figure out.

According to me, there's no solution to this unless the whole society evolves into a saint-like society. I don't think it's happening any time soon.

·
·
·

Who said anything was new...? [smile] Indeed, it's the oldest game on Our planet. If You examine what I propose, You will see that the structure, the foundation, allows for no "authority" - without the accounting for Human energy added into a system that accounts for Human energy added (money), the psychopaths have nothing for widespread influence, no longer able to pay strong arms and armies. No longer able to bribe, set up blackmail scenarios, threaten, ruin, or kill (through Their strong arms). They have to do Their dirty work PERSONALLY.

If We abandon the systems (which belong to the psychopaths), and consent to what I suggest We do, a truly free and healthy society will emerge. No "saint-like" behavior required.

No solution provided? What about the family unit? I heard reported by the lamestream news this kid was an orphan. Why was he cast away from his family? Why are people purposely having unprotected sex and dumping their babies off to institutions to raise them? Not having a mother or father around to care about them, it can really screw someone up in the head.

I ponder how anyOne cannot see the fakery in all these "events" used to push a clear agenda: "evaluate" People for "mental heath issues" to get something to protect Oneself with. This will give the psychopaths in control on Our planet the power to have only the Ones They want to be armed arming Themselves. This will leave all opposition to Them defenseless.

That this psyop - and all the others - are being taken as "truth" by anyOne astounds Me.

But what can be done, really? Violence has always been the currency for power. America has maintained such a stranglehold of power for so long--on the rest of the world as well as itself--to release would invite an immediate backlash that may be too great for humanity to survive. Like all past empires, the only likelihood for change may be implosion. These shootings may signal such change.

We have to ban guns. No, we need more guns. We need to put more police in public places — and even in schools to deter shooters. We need to ban gun-free zones. We need to blame all right-wingers. We need to blame all left-wingers. We need to call white violence terrorism. We need to blame psychotropic drugs. We need to ban Muslims. We need to (insert your reactionary opinion here).

Everybody thinks they know what’s wrong, but it seems nobody wants to acknowledge the plainly obvious reasons behind all this violence…crime-scene.jpgbucket-survival-kit-2.jpg