You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Great Steem-Tron Debate - How To Move On - A Plea To Both Sides

in #tron4 years ago

Interesting perspective.

First of all, even if you believe that both sides (the old witnesses and Justin) committed mistakes, I think the majority of people would agree that Justin getting the exchanges to vote was order of magnitudes much more serious and dangerous. It sets very very dangerous precedent for the entire blockchain and crypto community.

Secondly, you state "They did it because they feared what Justin might do, and that was wrong." If a completely unknown person had bought the stake, then it might make sense for the witnesses to give that person the benefit of the doubt and see what they did first. But Justin has a well documented history of being a bad actor interested in exercising centralized control. For example, take a look at:

https://medium.com/popnetwork/banned-from-the-blockchain-an-ethereum-developers-tale-of-migrating-to-tron-248a0d215c92

https://www.ccn.com/why-is-justin-sun-lying-to-tron-holders-follow-the-money/
(which shows Justin colluding with Binance on Tron matters)

https://blockmanity.com/news/tron/tron-is-centralized-and-has-low-supernode-turnout-says-ex-cto-of-tron/

There was also an article (can't find the link) about how on Tron blockchain, Justin had 2 super representatives (or witness equivalent) ousted who disagreed with a fork he wanted implemented. I'm not a Tron expert so I might have some of the details wrong on this issue.

These articles demonstrate a pattern of behavior and I think it was entirely reasonable for the witnesses (and anyone else) to conclude that this is Justin's modus operandi. I think it would be incredibly naive to automatically give him a blank slate and leave the community and blockchain vulnerable to the types of aggressive actions he has done before.

Sort:  

Hi, and first of all, thanks for your comments. However nothing you've said above justifies blocking access to his property. He paid $12,000,000 for Steemit, with that stake obviously being part of the deal.

Let's not forget that all that steem was owned by one individual before Justin, and that person quite legally sold it to him.

The witness should have listened to @timcliff, who ran a fork that didn't stop him getting his funds, but restricted his voting powers with it, which in itself is morally grey, but better than out and out theft and extortion, which is what the witnesses attempted.

Cg

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 64867.61
ETH 3451.61
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.55