RE: Rudy Giuliani's Meltdown. Who's The Real 'Moron'? Solid Evidence Shows He Lied About 9/11 Foreknowledge
Problem with this is that you only show the part where Giuliana defends himself from Chris's meltdown, a meltdown he was having before Giuliana and Chris get into it where Chris was part of a discussion with another guess and Laura has to tell him the other guest likes to be on more calmer shows whereas then Chris apologizes to the guess for not being able to maintain his composure while speaking.
For the accusations by Chris that Giuliana was lying was proven false by the fact that the next night on Laura's show he shows up with the text from the state department showing the communications between him and the state department.
What is happening here is called deflection from the truth. You don't show Chris having a meltdown, you can look at his face and tell he's having a meltdown. Like Chris you then go on about some tirade of 9-11 to try and further disparage Giuliana by focusing on those prior events. It more than likely was true he was told to evacuate, but the way some are wording it it makes it sound like he had days prior knowledge and I find that hard to believe because I don't think he'd be willing to go sit in a building knowing an airplane was going to be driven into it. I don't believe in the 9-11 narrative myself but to sit and deflect from current events by using the past isn't helping get to the bottom of what happened during the 2016 election. For Chris to sit there and claim Hillary and Obama was investigated intensively is true and most Americans feel she should have been charged. But it's also true that Ukrainian involvement wasn't looked into intensively and therein could lie the truth that would have finally put the nail in Hillary's coffin and the democrats involvement in the 2016 collusion narrative.
I am in no way claiming that the other speaker has integrity, I have seen him acting like an ass in other interviews too. My point here in relation to that video has only been that ad hominem attack shows an inability to think clearly and with balance - it also shows undercurrent intent that is dishonest and unproductive. I can be triggered into it myself in extreme situations and I know it doesn't help anything.
When it comes to 911, not only did he say that he was fore-warned of the towers' collapse at a time when no-one publicly had any evidence or expectation of their collapse, based on the structural engineering involved (even the NIST report said that these collapses were the first of their kind in history) - but he did nothing to advise others of the collapse AND most importantly, later LIED on camera - as shown - by saying he didn't have any foreknowledge of the collapse. Why would he lie?
That's exactly what happens when you watch videos that are cut without first finding the segment in it's entirety and review it. This was a classic ad hominem on the part of Chris, attack the messenger and not the message. Rudy was telling the truth, he came back the next night and proved it....but the conversation at hand was supposed to be about the whistle blowers deep democratic roots and bias, it was Chris that went unhinged, off topic (typical deflection tactic) by attacking Rudy's character and honesty on the matter instead of actually discussing the matter. We all know how these deflection tactics work, I for one was glad to watch Rudy contain so much composure over Chris by dishing it back at him much more composed and coherent then Chris was.
Like I said you tried the same thing here, you took a piece of something and tried to tie it into something totally unrelated instead of going to see if this criticism in this instance was warranted.
I am not trying anything. Even when people ad hominem attack me, I don't do it in return. I tend to just quote Socrates now - they settle down.
The 911 evidence is a clear example of a serious issue with him that makes him look terrible - it's infinitely more important than a talking point on Fox.
Like I said I hardly doubt any millionaire is going to agree to go to a area designated to be hit by an airplane. I couldn't imagine even what it would be like to be in his shoes that day. Yes I find a lot of it ironic, including having a secondary command post in place by coincidence that day but that still doesn't make it that he knew. I think Bush was one of the most corrupt and damaging presidency we've encountered, I don't believe the full truth has come out but to try and say because a person left out one word in a sentence makes it that they knew is sort of absurd when you think about the magnitude of it all. Yes he could have said "in the event the tower falls" but he may have just been phrasing someone else word for word, maybe working off the advice of an emergency manager, which most cities have in place. That day may have happened just as much to him as it did everyone else when you look at it in the context that for operations like this to succeed the less people who knew the better. For him to know in advance he'd had to keep quiet and watch untold number of friends/family potentially die that day and if he had warned them I would think that by now we'd had some people in this world with a conscience who'd stepped forwarded and said I was told by the mayor to stay away from the twin towers that day. Just as I think the Bush administration is the bigger issue on 9-11 I think Biden and his son is the bigger issue of what's going on now. To focus in on Trump exclusively is like focusing in on Giuliana over 9-11, the more worrisome corruption never gets fixed.