President Trump is Anti-Racist, in Table Format.

in #thedonald7 years ago

Am I the only one who noticed that the Media stopped reporting about Heather Heyer as soon as her mom thanked Trump?

Main tables describing how Donald Trump won the Nomination and the Presidency

I'm the table making pede, here for some more tables and narrative explosions with "unclear motives":

Donald Trump's Anti-Racism

Credit to "tanner" for inspiring me to make this

Year Event
1986 Trump receives the Ellis Island medal along with Rosa Parks
1991 Donald Trump says "he hates seeing what David Duke represents", in an interview with Larry King.
1997 Donald Trump was praised by anti-defamation leagues who confirmed Trump's legal fight to end anti-Semitism at private clubs
2000 Donald Trump calls David Duke a bigot, a racist, and a problem
2008 Donald Trump shelters Jennifer Hudson at the Trump International Hotel & Tower, Chicago, free of charge after her family was murdered
2015 Trump says he doesn't want David Duke's support, and that he really hopes that there isn't anything about his campaign that would attract hate groups
2016 CNN Reports that Trump disavows the alt-right, and that he specifically told the New York Times that he doesn't want to energise them
2017 Trump repeats his condemnation of hatred, bigotry, and violence

Recent declarations:

Donald Trump has repeatedly denounced the KKK over a long period of time.

Article Outlet Date
Donald Trump's campaign denounces support from KKK newspaper Los Angeles Times 11/01/16
Donald Trump On White Nationalists: ‘I Disavow And Condemn Them’ Daily Caller 11/22/16
Donald Trump issued a crystal clear disavowal of former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke CNN 03/03/16
Trump campaign denounces KKK's official newspaper's support CNN 11/01/16

What really makes me mad and angers me is how much attention and publicity David Duke is getting. Why would the Media attend his press conferences? The only thing that David Duke wants to do is divide us and screw over America, why is the Media giving him what he wants?

Trump doesn't "embolden" these hate groups. Character Assassination and Media Campaigns do, though.

Fuck the KKK scumbags. Meanwhile, the Media says "oh, Donald Trump is automatically a racist only because he wasn't specific enough1111111111111twelve".

If CNN reported in November of 2016 that Trump disavowed and tried to distance himself from the KKK scumbags, why would they report on Saturday, August 12th that he "once again" somehow "refuses" to condemn them? He's been condemning them for years.

Why?

Fake fucking News. That's why.

The Chicago Tribune reported in November, as well, saying that Trump has disavowed the "alt right" and established myths about them, of course, the Chicago Tribune is saying different things today.


Most of the reports about the Press Conference at Trump Tower were steered toward the left, basically saying that "Trump defends the 'alt right'", but in reality, he didn't. Even the Cuckpublicans in the House and in the Senate condemned Trump for this, even though I doubt any of them actually watched the Press Conference. He never condoned the Neo-Nazis.

What I gathered from the Press Conference:

Action Time
Trump explains why he waited "so long" to denounce specifically the KKK :05-:47
Trump repeats his condemnation of hatred, bigotry, and violence :50-1:01
Trump explains why he wanted the facts before he made the statement 1:16-1:24
Trump says that the victim of the KKK attacks was a wonderful, fantastic woman and that her mom thanked him 1:29-1:46
Record breaking numbers in job growth, finance, industry, and business 2:34-2:44
Trump says he didn't know that David Duke was even there in Charlottesville, which means he needed to wait before making a statement 3:17-3:19
Trump explains why multiple statements were given and why 3:50-3:59
The President says that the driver of the car was a disgrace to himself, his family, and his country 4:14-4:22
The President says that the driver of the car was a murderer 4:40-4:48
Trump says he never spoke to Bannon about the attack 4:54-4:56
The President explains that Bannon is NOT a racist 5:18-5:24
Trump asks the Reporter to define the alt-right, the reporter can't do it. Trump then discusses the alt-left 6:08-6:18
The media refuses to condemn the alt-left, ones who violently came charging at the alt-right 6:23-6:39
Trump tries to tell the Media that it was a horrible day, but they keep interrupting him, asking him more about Nazis 6:40-6:50
The President explains that one side was bad, but another side was also very violent 7:00-7:05
Trump explains that he's already condemned the Neo-Nazis 7:29-7:32

And that's just the first half.

Action Time
Trump explains the intents to taking down the statues, asks "where does it stop"? 7:39-8:17
The President tries to get the reporters to ask an infrastructure queston (what the topic is supposed to be), but the reporters insist, he answers the question appropriately 8:26-8:39
Trump explains that jobs being brought back will help settle racial tensions 8:42-9:31
The President tells of the work that he's done in the inner cities, saying that it's a priority for him 9:36-9:46
Trump explains the violence in Charlottesville, saying that both sides were horrible to watch 9:50-10:07
The President explains that the counter-protestors came violently attacking the KKK, this was deemed correct 10:14-10:16
Trump says that there were good people on both sides, he never explicitly called the Nazis "good people" 10:52-10:59
The President explains that many historical figures in the USA were slave owners 11:17-11:22
Trump explains that they're trying to change history, and that Neo-Nazis and the KKK should be condemned totally 11:44-11:54
The President says that what took place in Charlottesville was a horrible moment for our country 13:06-13:12
Trump says that McCain and the Senate couldn't agree on healthcare, but he says that Infrastructure might get bipartisan support 13:21-13:44
The President says that the Mother of the victim's statement was a very beautiful statement 13:56-14:00

The President said that jobs would have a positive impact on race relations, he's right.


Donald Trump's Favouritism and Celebration of Jewish Heritage

Action Date
Benjamin Netanyahu congratulates Trump's victory, first of many of calling him a "good friend" 11/09/16
Donald Trump, while wearing a yamaka, becomes the first sitting President to visit the Western Wall, with his Jewish Daughter 05/22/17
Donald Trump literally has a Hebrew Plaque in his office, this is shown during a WSJ interview 09/22/15
Jared Kushner, the President's son-in-law, is Jewish N/A
Donald Trump met with Jewish leaders and the Rabbi of the Western Wall 05/22/17
The Israeli President, Benjamin Netanyahu, congratulates Trump's Inauguration, calling him his "good friend" 01/20/17
Once more, a month later, Benjamin Netanyahu calls Trump "a great friend of the Jewish People", he also says that he doesn't have a greater friend than him. 02/16/17
Donald Trump says that "nobody has endured as much as the Jewish People, and we will never forget that" 02/16/17

Every day it becomes more and more clear that Republican Politicians alike are great friends with Israel. They stand with Israel. Nobody has been more of an ally than Donald Trump, maybe even more than Ted Cruz.

During the Obama Administration, Benjamin Netanyahu addressed congress. Many people ignored his remarks or scoffed at him. This is more of a prime example of us not standing with Israel. None of this has or will ever happen with Trump as the President.

Deconstructing Narratives

This bogus article by HuffPo

Mainly what's up with this article:

the Trump administration revoked a grant to Life After Hate, a group that works to de-radicalize neo-Nazis..... The Department of Homeland Security had awarded the group $400,000 as part of its Countering Violent Extremism program in January, just days before former President Barack Obama left office.

Okay, so they were given money to investigate something. Usually the DOH doesn't do that, ever since 9/11, the DOH usually doesn't outsource their materials, especially pertaining to Counterterrorism, this is a very unusual move.

including Katharine Gorka, a controversial national security analyst known for her anti-Muslim rhetoric

Okay, even if this did happen, Radical Islamic Terrorism is way more of a threat than White Supremacy has been in recent years, this is completely justified. I'm surprised the DOH even outsourced to this group anyway.

what the president has described as “radical Islamic terrorism.”

They won't even call it for what it is.

Radical. Islamic. Terrorism. It's real, it's growing, and it's dangerous. We shouldn't be afraid to call it for what it is.

Gorka told Selim and Gersten she didn’t agree with the Obama administration’s approach to countering violent extremism

This comment was completely based on assumption with no reference to said interview.

Gorka told Selim and Gersten she didn’t agree with the Obama administration’s approach to countering violent extremism

Also assumption, the article is trying to associate her with an intent to deny that White Extremism is extremism. It's a clear projection tactic by the article.

The Trump administration has repeatedly criticized the previous administration for avoiding terms like “radical Islam”

This is true.

“Katharine Gorka has been integral in helping the Department broaden efforts to focus on all forms of extremism. Her work includes efforts to address everything from global jihadists threats to domestic terrorists,”

Good, that means if she identifies ridiculous or unnecessary funding, she should fix it. That's her job.

mainstream national security experts are either unfamiliar with or critical of their work

Well of course they would be. They're Trump aids, everyone would be critical of their work. The article is trying to put Media "experts" over government officials.

the office of then-DHS Secretary John Kelly ordered a full review of the Countering Violent Extremism program. Kelly’s office wanted to re-vet the groups receiving a portion of the $10 million Congress had appropriated for the program

Good. We've had way more threats of Radical Islam than we've had of White Nationalism.

even though DHS had already publicly announced the grant recipients

The DHS would announce this with the GPO first. These public reviews could take weeks to process. The fact that the article doesn't reference to the GPO only attributes to my doubt of the article's truthful integrity.

Staffers in the Countering Violent Extremism program have long pushed for it to address threats from domestic terrorists, including white supremacists

I understand this. I support this, but as far as I'm concerned, White Nationalism isn't invading Baghdad right now and stealing a shit ton of oil. Palestinian Nationalism poses much more of an international threat. Domestic efforts are already conducted by the FBI, so funding to an external source at this point would be unnecessary.

But when DHS published a new list of award recipients on June 23, there was no mention of Life After Hate.

However, the published report did include a shit ton of funding to cops and other Counter-Terrorist organisations on a domestic level, thus making obsolete any further funds to this "Life After Hate" group. The previous funds were allocated unusually to that group by the Obama Administration, further and much better efforts can be directed toward more efficient government programs, rather than private programs.

DHS also revoked funding from the Muslim Public Affairs Council, an American Muslim advocacy organization that was told in January it would receive a $393,800 grant to create community resource centers throughout the country.

I'm not sure what to say about this but no source is given.

After publishing its new list of grantees, DHS told Muslim Public Affairs Council that it was now prioritizing organizations that worked with law enforcement. The money that was initially set aside for community-based groups like Muslim Public Affairs Council and Life After Hate will now go to several law enforcement agencies.

I can tell, obviously, according to the report, it shows that. What Rudy Giuliani did in 1994 for increased police funding helped clean up the city, imagine how much better our country would be when that happens. So, I support this decision to cut programs that previously went to private Counter-Extremist groups only if the funding goes to Police. I'm all for this. I don't see anything racist or anti-Muslim about this.

“Is this really just a front for targeting the Muslim community?” asked Omar Noureldin, Muslim Public Affairs Council’s vice president.

Lol what the heck, that came out of nowhere.

Noureldin is now looking into whether the Trump administration’s use of the Countering Violent Extremism program’s funds violates congressional appropriation intent.

The Kek it wouldn't. Not in a million years would prioritising a government agency over a private one be a violation of Congressional Appropriations. Even the Senate Appropriations Committee would agree on this, hell, even the Democrats would agree on this.

Less than two months after DHS announced it was pulling funding from Life After Hate, James Alex Fields Jr., a 20-year-old Ohioan, traveled to Charlottesville, Virginia, to join white supremacists armed with long guns, waving Nazi and Confederate flags and protesting the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from a local park.

The article is trying to make a connection here, where there is no connection. How would fields know about this report? Most people like him are so closed minded, they don't even know what's happening beyond a 20-yard radius of their front porch. Even if this "Life After Hate" program still had its funding, it couldn't do shit to stop what happened from happening.

Life After Hate was founded by former white supremacists who have renounced the racist ideology and who now help others transition out of hate groups and re-assimilate into society.

Good. I'm glad there are programs like this. I really am, I really am happy that some of these KKK scumbags can have their sins washed away. I just don't think that funding should go toward them when other government agencies are capable of much more than they are. I do believe, however, they could have used their expertise to inform Government Agencies about what was going on, but the article makes no mention of that. They had 3 days to contact the police and say: "hey, we worked for you guys until January, we have expertise in combating the KKK and White Extremism, do you need our help?" The police would be happy to receive their help.

The white supremacy movement “has been growing, but it’s also been shape-shifting,” Piccolini said. “It’s gone from what we would have considered very open neo-Nazis and skinheads and KKK marching, to now people that look like our neighbors, our doctors, our teachers, our mechanics.”

This is false. Those shaved-head freaks don't assimilate into our society. We've changed to exclude them, they deserve to be excluded because of their Hitler-Worshiping filth.

a lot of the rhetoric that’s coming out of the White House today is so similar to what we preached

Also false. Trump hasn't pandered to them in any way.

Just the fact that somebody with expertise in the field of violent White Extremism would go to the lengths and say that a Republican Candidate is similar to them only baffles me. I wouldn't appropriate funding to this guy in a million years if he said that to me.

That's literally just like saying: "Hey, would you help me stop the KKK? I think you're the KKK, so do you want me to help you stop them? I still think you're the KKK and you like them, if you refuse my help, I'll be forced to say that you support them. What do you think"?

No government agency would support someone who would sell out to the media that easily, either.

The president ignored several calls to specifically denounce white supremacists and neo-Nazis

He specifically denounced them on multiple different occasions.

It wasn’t until Monday, two days after the violent rally, that Trump specifically denounced “the [Ku Klux Klan], neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups.”

Fucking liar. He denounced it 25 minutes later. And even then, it took Obama 5 years to denounce Homophobia.

Trump’s hesitancy to disavow white supremacists echoes his practice of repeatedly dodging questions about David Duke

He hasn't dodged questions. When he was asked, he denounced them. Even dating back to 1991.

Trump eventually distanced himself from the infamous white supremacist

The use of the word "eventually" only proves they're lying. He has a long history of denouncing David Duke and those White Supremacist scumbags. They are against the Constitution.

He argued days before the Charlottesville attack that white supremacy is not “the problem” facing the country.

He never said that. He was mainly talking about making the Middle East a priority. Gosh they like to put words in people's mouths sometimes.....

DHS did not directly respond to a questions about why it cut funding for de-radicalizing neo-Nazis, and whether it views white supremacy as an extremist threat.

Of course they wouldn't. They wouldn't sell out to the Media only to have their words twisted into an entirely different context.

Sixteen of the 26 groups that received DHS funding “have applicability to all forms of violent extremism and as such will address the threat of domestic terrorism,” Franko, the DHS spokeswoman, wrote.

See, I told you. :)


Want to be more informed?

Tune in to GOVERNMENT Sources, not the lying media. Tune in to Senate Hearings, mostly.

Be informed by tuning in to these:

senate.gov senate.gov/committees real senate senators

house.gov justice.gov supremecourt.gov whitehouse.gov library of congress state.gov justice stats elections data.gov social security immigration.gov chemical safety benefits.gov nutrition.gov defense.gov interior and many more at usa.gov


Make AMERICA Great Again!

Sincerely,

-u/_Constructed_


Previous essays:


99.99% of Trump supporters absolutely hate the alt-right fascists with all of their guts. The KKK is against the Constitution and everything that Trump supporters stand for. They are an embarrassment.

There is also the violent alt-left. Anything that doesn't please them short term, they whine about. They claim to exhibit "social justice", but in reality, they poorly display Doctor King's principles of peace.

This sums up what's happening with Trump Supporters right now.

From the_donald

Sort:  

Congratulations @broken! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You published your First Post

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how here!

A perfect example of warping and twisting facts to serve an agenda - I hereby award to you the Trumpanzee of the day medal... Congrats...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.14
JST 0.028
BTC 58083.18
ETH 2578.52
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.42