Look man, I'm not putting anyone on blast, nor am I butthurt by any means.
@bullionstackers seems like a good guy and he has a lot of fun posts along with great photos...but this particular post has no foundation. How do you think a post like this looks to people who are just starting out here?
I have read all of the other posts by multiple other honorable members on this subject, including @bullionstackers previous post. (whether his was the first or not, I have no idea) I do get the gist of what is happening, or at least what everyone feels is happening. I'm concerned and curious, as are many others, so I clicked on this post that claims to have "proof/evidence in hand" - but the links that are provided have both been deleted. Not only that, but @bullionstackers had flagged the post in the link he shared. None of that makes sense - why would you flag a post that is claimed to have evidence?! Maybe it was an accident, I don't know.
Maybe by reading my confused responses, you jumped to the conclusion that I was putting @bullionstackers, (whom I agree is an honorable member of the community) on blast and "making myself look like a child" and then became butthurt, yourself...Just a thought.
I apologize that my comments seemed like I was putting him on blast, and I'm sorry you looked past the obvious reasons that I posted them and decided to instead believe that I was just being a dickweed.
When I read "whistle blowing" facts, I want clearly stated facts - moreover, if it is stated that there is "proof/evidence in hand", I want to see that proof...if that "proof" was deleted, I would like at least somewhat of an explanation as to what that "proof" contained, so I can formulate an opinion about it. Does that make more sense to you, now?