I know what you (and many others) mean, at first I was also shocked, but couldn't it actually have been the best decision to sell Steemit? Now, for example, Steemit, Inc. doesn't need to sell STEEM every month anymore.
At least I concede to @ned that he had the best intentions, and I would suggest to make peace with the past, where there are good and not so good memories, and concentrate on the future ... The remaining team members of Steemit, Inc. doesn't seem to see the change that negative ...
Anyway, I am not here to argue, and obviously the clear majority disagrees with my point of view.
Wish you a good time! :)
(By the way, my idea to limit the influence of single huge stake holders would be to grant every account not more than five to (at maximum) ten witness votes ...)
I know what you (and many others) mean, at first I was also shocked, but couldn't it actually have been the best decision to sell Steemit? Now, for example, Steemit, Inc. doesn't need to sell STEEM every month anymore.
At least I concede to @ned that he had the best intentions, and I would suggest to make peace with the past, where there are good and not so good memories, and concentrate on the future ... The remaining team members of Steemit, Inc. doesn't seem to see the change that negative ...
Anyway, I am not here to argue, and obviously the clear majority disagrees with my point of view.
Wish you a good time! :)
(By the way, my idea to limit the influence of single huge stake holders would be to grant every account not more than five to (at maximum) ten witness votes ...)