in terror •  2 years ago

Part 1

Part 2
Part 3

Talking Points

People are sad. Some are dead. Most are confused. Moslems? Amused¹.

I for one, am raging. Not as much about the actual attack, more so about the deception and manipulation being disseminated by The Powers That Should Not Be.

The talking points handed down are spamming the airwaves:

  • Eight minutes for Police to kill suspects - admiration for brave police
  • More armed police on the streets, citizens defended themselves with chairs
  • Divisive politics, dividing communities no longer tolerated ('right wing' extremism)
  • This is normality - carry on, keep calm
  • "Safe" Spaces Online, and in real world
  • Innocent Muslems** - Muslem** faith not responsible


Bilderberg finished. There, plans have been finalized, decisions been made. Unlawful actors. A deep state planning event. A distraction was needed. Manchester, London. The criminal elites' dirty fingerprint.

U.K. elections called by T May for one main reason: To hand power back to the Communist arm of Globalism with the main goal to prevent Brexit and isolate international support for U.S. President Donald J Trump and the patriots who voted for him.

Armed Police to quench patriotic dissent.

Normalize Citizen Roundups - Crunch Dissent

Not the 23,000 islamic terrorists and their sympathizers residing in the U.K, but the critics of Islam and Islamic terrorism, the patriots, the white middle class of Britain and Europe are the target of population control. What a telling picture:

People leave the area with their hands up after an incident near London Bridge in London

A hostile actor dead yet seemingly unharmed?

This photo shows *the alleged terrorists, just killed by a barrage of automatic gun fire. These hostile actors in camouflage, military boots. Shot. Not an oz of blood from gun injuries. A fairy tail?

Eight minutes to success - A military and mathematical impossibility?

Is it plausible, believable, even possible that police shot and killed the exact three alleged terrorists only eight minutes after the first call to police? Consider London traffic. Consider multiple scenes of chaos. Consider the alleged suspects in close proximity to the general crowd, slashing people's throats in different bars and restaurants.

Eight minutes to get to a suspected location in central London? Eight minutes to successfully analyze the situation? Eight minutes to correctly identify, isolate and kill the suspects? Spot on? Bloodless?

Is this a logistical possibility?

Any mathematicians and military personnel, vets, please do have a close look, analyze and comment.

We need statistical analysis.

Disregard the blatant lies and propaganda of the state and their henchmen.

Think. Investigate. Analyze. Prove. Publish.


My prayers and condolences goes out to all those who have been affected by the criminal terror act on June 3rd 2017 in London. I pray for the victims of state sponsored terror in the U.K. and elsewhere.

I also pray for the ruthless politicians and backroom actors, the Bilderbergers, the corrupt and criminal elements within society who are acting on greed for money and power.

I pray for those who are ignorant to truth. I pray, that their eyes may be opened, that they may repent and change the path of destruction they are on and may thus also be blessed.



*edited from singular to plural
** edited from Moslem to Muslim, pls see comment section for explanation.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I would be very happy to share this article but with respect to people of Islamic or Muslim background I respectfully request that Muslim be spelled correctly. I did note the ? mark but several of my FB friends are Arabic and I have some family living in the Middle East. I am indigenous American and mixed white European, have taught kindergarten in a private school in the Middle East and have teacher contacts including some missionary friends who also may wish to re-share. Kind regards


Hello @sojmed44,

thank you for your reply. Your concern is noted and your respect for your Arabic friends appreciated. Please let me explain the reasoning for the use of this linguistic nuance.

Either spelling is valid according to the Center for Nonproliferation Studies and the Religious Studies Program, University of Wyoming.

Excerpt from

According to the Center for Nonproliferation Studies,"Moslem and Muslim are basically two different spellings for the same word." But the seemingly arbitrary choice of spellings is a sensitive subject for many followers of Islam. Whereas for most English speakers, the two words are synonymous in meaning, the Arabic roots of the two words are very different. A Muslim in Arabic means"one who gives himself to God," and is by definition, someone who adheres to Islam. By contrast, a Moslem in Arabic means"one who is evil and unjust" when the word is pronounced, as it is in English, Mozlem with a z.


  1. the Arabic root of MO versus MU

  2. The validity of MOSLEM maintained by Islamic organizations.

(1) The spelling here purposefully differentiates doing evil, vs. adhering to Islam. Would your Muslim friends NOT want to distance themselves from Islamists sypmathizing with terrorist?

(2) Why would certain Islamic organizations, such as American Moslem Foundation and The Moslem World retain the MO root, when it indicates evil doing? Would, no, SHOULD this not be an excellent way for non violent adherents to Islam to distance themselves from those elements within their group that use their belief system to justify acts of terror yet chose to retain their spelling MOSLEM?

Food for thought?




Thank you for this very good explanation and your work.


Thank you for reading and upvoting!