Ray Kurzweil on the Singularity and the birth of Intelligent AI

in #technology7 years ago (edited)

Are we evolving into a new life form more intelligent than biological Man - A new jump, a new dawn in the history of Evolution?

"2045: The Singularity:

$1000 buys a computer a billion times more intelligent than every human combined. ...

The technological singularity occurs as artificial intelligences surpass human beings as the smartest and most capable life forms on the Earth."

Creating Human-Level AI: How and When | Ray Kurzweil
{click on image below to see YouTube video}

“Most long-range forecasts of what is technically feasible in future time periods dramatically underestimate the power of future developments because they are based on what I call the “intuitive linear” view of history rather than the “historical exponential” view.”
― Ray Kurzweil, The Singularity is Near

“The story of evolution unfolds with increasing levels of abstraction.”
― Ray Kurzweil, How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed

“as long as there is an AI shortcoming in any such area of endeavor, skeptics will point to that area as an inherent bastion of permanent human superiority over the capabilities of our own creations. This book will argue, however, that within several decades information-based technologies will encompass all human knowledge and proficiency, ultimately including the pattern-recognition powers, problem-solving skills, and emotional and moral intelligence of the human brain itself.”
― Ray Kurzweil, The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology

“Electronic circuits are millions of times faster than our biological circuits. At first we will have to devote all of this speed increase to compensating for the relative lack of parallelism in our computers, but ultimately the digital neocortex will be much faster than the biological variety and will only continue to increase in speed.”
― Ray Kurzweil, How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed

“It is important to note that the design of an entire brain region is simpler than the design of a single neuron. As discussed earlier, models often get simpler at a higher level—consider an analogy with a computer. We do need to understand the detailed
physics ofsemiconductors to model a transistor, and the equations underlying a single real transistor are complex. A digital circuit that multiples two numbers requires hundreds of them. Yet we can model this multiplication circuit very simply with one or
two formulas. An entire computer with billions of transistors can be modeled through its instruction set and register description, which can be described on a handful of written pages of text and formulas. The software programs for an operating system,
language compilers, and assemblers are reasonably complex, but modeling a particular program—for example, a speech recognition programbased on hierarchical hidden Markov modeling—may likewise be described in only a few pages of
equations. Nowhere in such a description would be found the details ofsemiconductor physics or even of computer architecture. A similar observation holds true for the brain. A particular neocortical pattern recognizer that detects a particular invariant
visualfeature (such as a face) or that performs a bandpass filtering (restricting input to a specific frequency range) on sound or that evaluates the temporal proximity of two events can be described with far fewer specific details than the actual physics and
chemicalrelations controlling the neurotransmitters, ion channels, and other synaptic and dendritic variables involved in the neural processes. Although all of this complexity needs to be carefully considered before advancing to the next higher conceptual level,
much of it can be simplified as the operating principles of the brain are revealed.”
― Ray Kurzweil, How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed

“There are no inherent barriers to our being able to reverse engineer the operating principles of human intelligence and replicate these capabilities in the more powerful computational substrates that will become available in the decades ahead. The human brain is a complex hierarchy of complex systems, but it does not represent a level of complexity beyond what we are already capable of handling.”
― Ray Kurzweil, The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology

Raymond "Ray" Kurzweil (/ˈkɜːrzwaɪl/ KURZ-wyl; born February 12, 1948) is an American author, computer scientist, inventor and futurist. Aside from futurism, he is involved in fields such as optical character recognition (OCR), text-to-speech synthesis, speech recognition technology, and electronic keyboard instruments. He has written books on health, artificial intelligence (AI), transhumanism, the technological singularity, and futurism. Kurzweil is a public advocate for the futurist and transhumanist movements, and gives public talks to share his optimistic outlook on life extension technologies and the future of nanotechnology, robotics, and biotechnology.........
Quote source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil

Now ask yourself - IF you could download yourself to an android and maintain your conscious self - Would you do it?
Could you stand existing as an artificial life form?

Sort:  

I wouldn't even considering that i'm geek myself. I don't think we should convert ourselves into robots. Transhumanism and personalities are incompatible.

Check this out:
"Michio Kaku: Could We Transport Our Consciousness Into Robots?"

I was thinking about perfect artificial beings and i've come to a conclusion that ideal artificial life might be biological. Look at humans we replicate ourselves, we can feed ourselves with self replicated food, we can survive a huge cataclysm and have already did it in the past. Robots won't survive electrical collapse, they won't even survive a strong solar storm. But what is really frightening me is the advance in bioprocessors, nanotechnology and neurobiology. Some day scientists will be able to implant a bioprocessor in you and you won't even notice it. The more we know how to program and to reprogram the brain the more threats arise. It's the pandora box we shouldn't open.

The so called 'Pandora's box' has already been opened - You can not stop the future from evolving - This evolution, if you are a believer in anything has a preordained goal - What it is I can'[t say for sure - And yet evolution continues - If the consciousness that backs all existence says biological life is inefficient - it will replace biological life with a new more efficient operating system - You and I my friend may be at the end of biological evolution - Welcome to the the New Dawn of machine consciousness .

Consciousness and simulation is the different things. Efficient? What are the criterias of efficiency? Faster calculations means better consciousness? Nah. And don't you know that biorobots are the best form of life? Biorobot don't give a fuck about sun bursts and don't give a fuck about power shortages. He can consume a big variety of energy sources and can resist EMP. Metal silicon-based machines is a failing dream of previous millenium.

Great video, great man, i like him) I'm asking the same questions!

Check out my new post:
"The Far Future of the Universe - The Future is Now!!! Welcome to the New Dawn"
https://steemit.com/future/@ourworld/the-far-future-of-the-universe-the-future-is-now-welcome-to-the-new-dawn

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.026
BTC 57396.91
ETH 2446.23
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.41