Flammable Ice: Are We on The Verge of a New Energy Revolution?

in technology •  2 years ago

11 days ago China has started mining of "Flammable Ice". 3 days ago China Central television announced the start of the hydrocarbon revolution, scale of which Chinese experts compare with the slate revolution in the US.

Flammable ice, or methane clathrate is a crystalline compound, which are formed from water and gas under certain pressure and temperature. In fact it is the frozen methane and water, and looks like pressed snow.

hi-methane-hydrates852-cp95.jpg

In its energy capacity, the "Flammable ice " is superior to any natural source of energy: 1 cubic meter of methane clathrate contains 164 cubic meters of usual natural gas.

For example: 100 liters of gas allow the car to pass 300 km, while 100 liters of " flammable ice " - 50 thousand kilometers.

Such a high energy intensity is due to the fact that the combustible ice has a сlathrate structure. Methane molecules are not mixed with water molecules, but are located inside its crystal lattice. Therefore, methane is practically free of foreign impurities, its "purity" reaches 99.5%.

333.png

Can flammable ice change the alignment of forces in the global hydrocarbon market?


The estimated global reserves of flammable ice are more than double the reserves of coal, oil and natural gas taken together. Deposits of combustible ice discovered as on land (in the permafrost) and on the seabed, at depths of 500-2000 meters. It is worth noting that the largest land and sea deposits are located on China's territory.

111.png

New deposits, discovered in China, are a huge source, equivalent to at least 35 billion tons of oil (this is enough to provide China with energy for 90 years, not using other sources of energy).

Specialists of China managed to produce 120 cubic meters of combustible ice in about 10 days. The well is located 285 km South-East of Hong Kong, the production depth of 1200 meters.

The idea to extract these crystalline compounds have existed for many years: the work in this direction are also being held in Canada and Japan. However, only China has been able to carry out the production of hydrate from the seabed in such volume. Previously, the production of this resource was constrained by technological and financial factors. It is unknown how much cost-effective method of mining, but China is not going to stop.

jack-up-rig-in-the-caspian-sea.jpg

China has been able to get much large amount of combustible ice than the Japanese in 2013. It really looks like the beginning of commercial production. They plan to increase production to 16.thousand cubic meters per day.

However, international experts believe that the world industry will be able to master the use of this resource not earlier than in 15 years. The second most complex technological process, after mining, is the extraction of methane from the ice.

maxresdefault.jpg

Scientists point out that it is necessary to carry out this process very carefully, because any mistake can lead to terrible consequences. The emission of pure methane into the atmosphere in large quantities will significantly accelerate global warming. On the other hand, during the combustion this methane will significantly reduce the level of pollution, because it almost doesn't contains impurities.


sources: Naked Science, news.cctv.com, China mining flammable ice, Methane clathrate, Clathrate compound, Clathrate hydrate images from Google Search.


U5drPHGwH6S674iu73qnmQX9NFK1YgE_1680x8400.png

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

100 liters of gas allow the car to pass 300 km, while 100 liters of " flammable ice " - 50 thousand kilometers.
I am VERY skeptical of those numbers.
show the math please?
what is the energy density( btu's per lb) of gasoline vs that of 'flammable Ice'

·

It is comparison not with a gasoline engine, and with gas (propane for example).
300 km* 164= 49200 km. A simple illustrative example of the energy intensity, without calculating η

·
·

I've owned and used a propane powered vehicle in the past. I dispute those numbers based on past experience.
Most I could get was 300miles on(ten?) gallons.
about 12 mpg.
I got better Mpg on gasoline (it was dual fuel) but propane cost less.

·
·
·

I believe in your experience, my friend.
But as i said, it is illustrative example, it could looks like:

10 liters of gas allow the car to pass 300000 km, while 10 liters of " flammable ice " - 500 thousand kilometers.

·
·
·
·

well for one thing..10 quarts of gas (any kind of gas..propane or gasoline ) will NOT fuel ANYTHING for 300,000 klicks...maybe 300...maybe...If you're riding a mo-ped.

Very interesting article - well done!

·

Thank you!


Join us on #steemSTEM

A well written piece on 'flammable ice'. Very nice job.

As a bonus, and in addition to resteeming for exposure, we are awarding you a small 10 Steem Power deposit as a thank you for creating quality STEM related postings on Steemit. We hope you will continue to educate us all!

·

Thank you very much for your support! It is a great honor for me.

Very interesting discovery! I guess the decision for its large-scale extraction will depend on the estimation of mining costs plus methane extraction. I'm pretty sure it won't go unused but I can't tell whether it is a viable technology in comparison to other fossil fuels. I personally have more faith in nuclear energy (updated fission technologies and hopefully fusion) as well as personalized alternative energy technologies for each country (solar, wind, etc). There are side effects here as well but the long-term advantage is incomparable in my opinion.

·

I agree with you. Actually I don't really like that humanity continues to use hydrocarbons instead to develop alternative sources. Many countries are moving to environmental-friendly sources, but this process is not as fast as would like.

Great post! Very interesting...

·

Thank you. I myself did not know that we have at our fingertips such a source of energy.

·
·

Same here.
Those smart chinese ones.

Excelente!!

·

I'm glad that you liked it!

Wow, this is funky. I had no idea there was such a thing!

·

I was surprised too. especially when I found out that first deposits were discovered in the 60's

·
·

Yeah it's wild to think that it has been known for so long

firewater. who knew?

wow ! good post!