Cloud migration hosting in Google, Amazon, or Microsoft
Moving to the Cloud
The following article outlines what moving servers to Google Cloud Compute, Amazon Web Services, or Microsoft Azure means. Most businesses want to move to the "cloud" but have no idea what that means. If you're a small business you typically have a couple computers scattered around with one storage device. If you're a medium or large business you probably already have several servers at a location in a contract. Moving to the cloud is often pitched to businesses using Software-as-a-Service replacing the current system with a web application that runs through your browser. While this is ideal, in most instances it isn't practical. So you keep paying for a bloated IT infrastructure that is dated, isn't as reliable, and unable to change with your business needs.
Leverage Google Cloud Compute, Amazon Web Services, or Microsoft Azure to move those servers to an enterprise environment. Moving your servers will often end up costing between $100 - $400 per server a month depending on your environment. When you factor in that there is no capital expenditure, maintenance, or power costs this is a far cheaper solution than your current environment. You also gain a SUBSTANTIAL increase in flexibility, performance, and reliability. So why hasn't everyone transitioned to these services?
The main issue is getting to these services. It's hard to find businesses, technicians, or engineers that will do the migration. In the end, you should be paying these companies directly.
- Contracting a company that uses their own hardware and you pay them for substandard service and equipment on a monthly basis.
- Under-estimating the extended downtime that is required for moving to these services. If you have 30+ servers it will take months for preparation, transfer time, and deployment.
- Degraded service if you have to work in a hybrid environment. Working through a VPN for an extended time that it takes to complete the full migration.
- Mass Storage - Most of the cost of using these services come from storage, and typically it's not till you hit the petabytes that you'd run into ROI issues. As a general rule of thumb, anything less than 1000 Terabytes is more cost-effective using these services.
ConclusionI think every business should be leveraging this technology. The larger the business the harder the migration will be. Small businesses I've done in the course of a day, whereas larger businesses take considerably longer. Stay the course and keep searching for talent capable of helping with this transition. I enjoy using all three of these major players in the market, however, for Website Hosting and Linux boxes I like Google Cloud Compute the most, and for businesses already running Office 365 Microsoft Azure makes for the easiest transition.
Leave any Questions and Comments below and I will get back to you. I regularly publish on YouTube, Steemit, and christitus.com so if you’d like to see more videos and articles click the subscribe button in the top right.
Posted from my blog with SteemPress : https://www.christitus.com/2017/02/27/cloud-migration/