You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SLC | S21W4 : Worksheets Learners

in Teachers & Students2 years ago

Thank you, @artist1111 for participating in the teaching Team Challenge. Below is an evaluation of your article :

Free of Plagiarism
AI Article
#steemexclusive

Comment/Recommendation 👇🏻
1). Yes, you have given your opinion on the learners worksheet along with its benefits, conceptually this is a formal guide.

[1.9/2]

2).Thank you for sharing the example learner worksheets you have, maybe this will be even better if you present it with a good improvement. You may be able to inform your time allocation and class schedule.

[2.5/5]

3). You have explained your opinion well, and we really appreciate it.

[1/1]

4). Thank you for the explanation you outlined.

[0.8/1]

5).I appreciate the photos you shared with us.

[1/1]


Final Score : 7.2/10

Improvements/Advice : It needs strengthening and also improvement in terms of presentation, this is just a personal opinion. Overall we appreciate what you have outlined, and the many things we can learn. Good luck.


Without prejudice to respect, again without prejudice to my respect.
This is just a suggestion from me as a teaching team to assess what users write, you have the right to respond or not to respond. Because the assessment process is based on the knowledge that I mastered as a teacher in real life, everyone has different levels of understanding and tastes. Overall this post is valuable and of great quality, keep up the great work. Best regards to you.

Sort:  
 2 years ago (edited)

2).Thank you for sharing the example learner worksheets you have, maybe this will be even better if you present it with a good improvement. You may be able to inform your time allocation and class schedule. (2.5/5)

Thank you for your feedback! As a educator, you’d know that when we assess any worksheet or assignment, we aim to be thorough and precise in evaluating a student's understanding. Your suggestion about time allocation and class schedule is noted, though I must admit I'm scratching my head over the grading. Given the comments, the deficiency highlighted was just about 5%—which, in my mind, would usually point to a solid performance. Yet, a score of 2.5 out of 5 seems to fall short of that expectation.

For instance, imagine a dish that’s 95% delicious but gets rated as "half-cooked." You’d be left wondering what part of the recipe went wrong, wouldn’t you? Similarly, I feel that my effort covered 90-95% of the required elements, which should surely warrant a bit more generous recognition. Let’s just say, the math doesn’t quite add up in my educational dictionary! 😊

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.04
TRX 0.33
JST 0.078
BTC 61890.78
ETH 1628.33
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.40