I agree that bullies are bullies, whichever side they are on. Violence and property destruction are not generally the way people should be expressing their views. I take issue with some LGBTQ+ fringe issues but everyone should be able to express their views.

Since I'm not a subscriber, wsj isn't letting me read that article. I do wonder though how much threats of violence are really a factor here or if they are just looking at what has happened to Budweiser. Maybe I'm just being cynical but using 'threats of violence' as an excuse makes Target look a whole lot more sympathetic than if they just decided to remove these products because they were afraid they would impact sales negatively.