You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: LET'S AMP IT UP. SYNEREO AMP'S WILDSPARK AND WHY IT MATTERS.
Interesting, but it sounds a lot like Steemit doesn't it? Or should I say Steem and Reddcoin combined
Interesting, but it sounds a lot like Steemit doesn't it? Or should I say Steem and Reddcoin combined
This is more advertiser based than user based IMO It will be the sites like themerkle.com and cointelegraph etc that will benifit from it. The people who the share the links to the most people. Like a massive affiliate program that starts at the content creator.
The only issues I can see are the coins themselves, as far as I can tell they aren't PoS or masternode coins right? The reason the Reddcoin model is plausible in my opinion is that you get "free" coins that you can give away at no loss to yourself, but if I had to actually give you my hard earned money directly, it is less likely to happen. I'm not saying that it is necessarily a problem, but I can see this getting less transactions than the Steemit or Reddcoin system.
Just after waking up >.>.. Amp not being a mastrnode or POS coin is fine. Personally just because a coin pays dividends does not mean it will be successful. Take chaincoin for instance. The only redeeming factor about it is the fact that it has masternode's. Other than that it has no actual real world value. The value in AMPs is that you need to buy AMP's to get more AMP's. If you want to share a persons content you give them amps. Reddcoin is more focused on tipping while AMP's are more focused on getting Clicks. You must realize the bi differance between Steemit, Reddcoin and amps. They have completely differnt use cases. If steemit is content creation, reddcoin curation then Amps would be affiliation.