Obviously, we immediately identified as a logical error. The

Obviously, we immediately identified as a logical error. The circle is well here. Here we have here. Here it is often said about this as some kind of limiting to the level of Yes and they are to the ultimate generalization and some finale we come which we simply admit but Zarya. I think that we can talk about the fact that such an extremely abstract category A of an insignificant degree is comprehended intuitively-logical is difficult to define, and here the category of being lies this intuition of total-unity, we can not all this unity prove it does not follow anything, we can not prove that all things are all objects in this world are related to a different kind of relationship but we somehow intuitively feel it and we postulate it in this category as I start what the analyst begins to when we begin to distinguish different kinds of being different kinds of being and during this process write a lot because the reality is given to us in our video experience a lot of different kinds of objects and that you say when we are talking here these Kalugin division level of being yes Well, for example, yes, let's say there is a social being material and spiritual yes or yes or subjective objective here there are two such analytical procedures Either we single out some parts of this cumulative image of reality Or we can still try to isolate some entities that are hidden behind a variety and then we come to the category of substances here it is such a very important point this transition in substance category