You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: "Content Creation" Is Hard Work
If you had an writer AI and copied it to another computer, and gave the two the same inputs, would they produce the same art?
If so, would it be plagarism?
If art can be machine-produced... Society isn't really built with that in mind.
depends on the code, your thinking is quite flawed they can have different inputs I mean change their own "interpretation" they can even learn from before and add more in, you are thinking in terms of code that is "dead" nowadays you can do so much more so much faster. You can program it to swap modules to swap inputs/outputs to iterate and improve to add in new ones and so on. :) Aren't we all just autonomous machines taken out of the universe :)
It will be fascinating to watch the ongoing development of machine thought, that's for sure! ;)
I would say that art is in the eye of the beholder. :)
We do have similar conflicts of interest, even among humans. It is not at all unusual for "the time to be ripe" for some particular invention. There have been inventors (as one myself, I recognize invention as a high art) who have come up with the same conceptual breakthrough at about the same time. Both are original; who "owns" the idea?
In the case of duplicate writer AIs, I would be inclined to credit the AI software author. ;)
maan you will love cowboy beebop, not much AI's but it entertains some pretty awesome concepts.