A: Is it dangerous to use radioactive camera lenses?

in #stemq6 years ago (edited)

As always, I'll keep the style of my answer and decompose the question into several subquestions in order to explain in better:

  • what is the source of radiation in those lenses
  • what type of radiation is present and what are the consequences
  • as always, should you buy one, just as a cool item

Why Thoriated glass?

The advantage of thorium glass is due to its high refractive index and low dispersion, two most important parameters for "practical optics".

Here is the example of such a graph.

Refractive index is simple to understand, keeping Snell's law in mind. High refractive index = more efficient "curving" of the light.

Abbe number (V-number) is a bit more complex but intuitive to understand. Different wavelengths will behave in a different manner and will take different angles. If you play with the eyeglasses, you will be able to see rainbow-like structures.

For camera lenses, it's useful to describe the refractive indexes at several specific wavelengths, so called Fraunhofer D-, F- and C- spectral lines (589.3 nm, 486.1 nm and 656.3 nm respectively). In simple words, green, violet and red.

What about radioactivity?

Good scientific literature is very scarce, but this paper is wonderful.

The full sequence could be found on Page 7, and the most important for you is to notice that there are two types of radiation: α and β-.

Both types have an incredibly short reach and can be stopped by basically anything. Including the - air.

Practical guide

As always, I'll give you some ideas for shopping. Here is the full list and those are my favourites:

SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4

This is one of the most popular f/1.4 lenses and among the cheapest with the 100 $ price tag. The mount is M42, so you will have no problems to properly adapt it.


From Wiki. Notice the recognizable yellow colour, that emerges due to formation of F-centers. This "farben" (stain) can be fixed by placing it on the sun

Canon FL 50/1.4, eary versions

Dating back from the 60's with a similar price tag. Include the adapter as well (probably). It's not EF, not FD, it's FL!

StemQ Notice: This post was originally submitted on StemQ.io, a Q&A application for STEM subjects powered by the Steem blockchain.

Sort:  

So these lenses are not dangerous? 😉

So long as you don't eat them they are not! I wonder though if you get more noise from particle strikes on the sensor, particularly if you do long exposure work?

This is a seriously interesting question! I'll try to find if such interference is possible *(I would bet on "No", but who knows)





This post has been voted on by the SteemSTEM curation team and voting trail in collaboration with @utopian-io.

If you appreciate the work we are doing then consider voting both projects for witness by selecting stem.witness and utopian-io!

For additional information please join us on the SteemSTEM discord and to get to know the rest of the community!

Hi @alexs1320!

Your post was upvoted by Utopian.io in cooperation with @steemstem - supporting knowledge, innovation and technological advancement on the Steem Blockchain.

Contribute to Open Source with utopian.io

Learn how to contribute on our website and join the new open source economy.

Want to chat? Join the Utopian Community on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.15
JST 0.030
BTC 65836.42
ETH 2694.41
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.87