You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Cool Science of the Slippery Ice

in #stemng6 years ago

I like that the falsifying in this instance is in italics. But when carefully examined, the case here is simple, the researchers arrived at the conclusion which was presented as they strive to find a conclusion to that event. In actual sense, people are still working on the project. Should we take their conclusion to be correct? That's a subjective answer which I'd like to hear inputs from the readers.

Sort:  

With the mindset I presented, we should not take their viewpoint to be correct. We can, however, consider it to be less likely to be false than the competing hypothesis.

That, I can totally agree with :D

Posted using Partiko Android

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 61434.10
ETH 2474.37
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.64