You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An Argument For Stefan Molyneux
I completely agree on abolishing all the things here but the problem comes when one of them is not abolished
The initiation of force proposed by stephan (close the borders) looks to me more like a preventive self-defense
If it is legal to initiate force to the people that are close to you it needs to be legal to keep people away from you too
The ideal case is to have no borders and no welfare but having both looks more sustainable than only one
Amen brother. Until the welfare state has been removed, unfettered immigration will increase the property violations inflicted by the state.
Closing the borders is self defense.