Hello @lemouth.

The first or second paragraph of the thematic introduction to my publications, generally I do some mythological, legendary, historical story or that is sprinkled of humorous interest. However, I clarify the context and frame the differentiation between the previous plane and scientific arenas.

The field of criminology is so extensive that being interdisciplinary it lacks integration of other sciences to obtain more effective results. Hence it is said to be a young science that will never age because it is constantly evolving and progressing. Meanwhile, this essay is a fragment of an academic work that I share in the form of a post. In it I subjectively make some considerations according to the specialized literature that I have reviewed.

From my own experience and also from documentary references, I know that external factors, being precisely sociology the one in charge of the study of multiple social and environmental factors that are generally linked to criminal behavior.
Between disciplines such as criminal psychology and sociology are precisely in charge of studying this type of behavior in order to establish causal analysis that allows following a corrective treatment. However, to deal with such a complex and at the same time controversial topic from an interdisciplinary point of view in an expansive way in a single article is extremely ambitious. I have not yet reached that synthetic capacity.

However, it helps me to better understand the structuring of the title and the scope or delimitation of the post. I only made reference that the topic will continue, but I did not make it clear that in its content I gather the contributions of the positivist school and particularly of Cesare Lombroso.

Your valuable comments are important to improve my ability to write articles with scientific input. So I appreciate those details that contribute to my growth as a writer.