RE: SteemSTEM Community Feedback: Proposals and Solutions
Curators will get a new task: write a curation report for any post upvoted more than 50%, explaining why this post is a good post and the reasons behind the strong upvote.
Hope this would not discourage curators from giving out big votes? Some of them might be busy with their schedules, and may have just few minutes to curate. And making them to write reports for giving out large votes could make them resort to curating posts with smaller votes - so maybe they wouldn't pass through the stress of writing reports. My thoughts though; I could be wrong.
The Honour Members will be assigned the task of tracking and scoring the exemplary comments that are worthy to be rewarded. The information will be passed to our curation team for a SteemSTEM upvote.
I believe this would increase post engagement within the community. And people would drop constructive comments.
Nice one. Better days ahead. Change is always constant
There was a demand for that originating from the community. For now, there is not much work (because not much posts) which is why we proposed it.
This crossed my mind too. Generally this is avoided because work is reflected with a commission fee which we don't have, so hopefully we can incentivize enough with other benefits and trust the curators to believe in what we do (which is the only thing keeping pretty much anyone on board)