well, if i didnt know better, id almost think you've been reading my posts and replies, sensei.

That's real stretch you got there, i mean, ... starting from dark matter then giving it actual attributes?

that's why call it theoretical physics, right? i mean, why would dark matter behave in any way like normal quarks spinning like a 14 year old girls head in all directions all the time?

its a theory that "might" work

have you ever considered that neutrinos might be an observation by self-fulfilling prophecy just because they "look like" what you expect to see ?

thats the beauty of it all i think, because once you're sure you're like the doctor who has healed everyone : out of the job

i doubt that will happen soon though

well you know me, im not a-verse to variable gravity, in my head that would make sense as the whole universe oscillates but

i'm the wisest of all greeks since i know i know nothing at all hahah

this isnt french for beginners, you know that, right ?

good to have you back, i hope you cleared that head of yours to bring it on again ...

i never had my own personal particle physicist until i got on steemit ;-)

i really like the picture of "the eye of god" you got upthere, ive been looking for a while for a constellation / galaxy that looks like an "x" i saw the picture one time , ever and i havent found it back ... maybe its a favourite at Nasa and someone here can point me somewhere ?
im probably more of a byronic man than a baryonic one myself but ive always had questions since i was a kid, drove my parents crazy