You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Rehearsal of Human Criminal Behavior
Hey @lemouth,
I think you're right about that, because here, too, you can draw on science and say that "unhealthy behaviour" of living beings most likely will become "healthy behaviour" when the framework in which they move is changed. Create an environment that is good for coexistence and culture and the participants in the system adapt. Create a difficult, mono-environment where strict survival seems to be at stake and you also have participants adapted to that environment. Even genes adapt to their environment - is what I have read somewhere - and are not "static". Everything is an interplay of multiple factors and this interplay is so complex that mono-causality is no longer an option in the latest sciences anyway.
Thanks for agreeing with my guesses (which sounds quite logical to me, but human logics is not science :) ).
I think one does not exclude the other :) For example, a fisher man living all his life at the shore does not use data (quantitative scientific evidence) to make his decisions but his experience with the weather and the sea. So we people use our life experience where we may have known a person changing "from Saulus to Paulus", readjusting his lifestyle from a former criminal to a non criminal.
I agree with this. This is clearly a combination of different parameters and which one dominates is probably also an individual-dependent statement :)