You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: NATIONAL COIN SHORTAGE...
You're consolidating power. In the past, communities used to manage spam and plagiarism. Individual accounts would get together and contribute. They would curate posts. Now the power is just consolidated to you. This is the essence of centralization. You can say, "Ah but mah perspective" all you want. Whales and witnesses are centralization. You can google for all the people that agree.
https://steemit.com/@endingplagiarism/notifications
Filter by "Mentions" and take a look at a few. Take a look at how many different users get together and contribute. endingplagiarism sacrifices her own time to administer it.
If you're so against centralization or whatever you think is happening here, I'm surprised by how determined you are to hang around.
Just because you have user participation does not make it decentralized. The power (through delegation) is in the hands of one. Ultimately, you make the decision.
Further, you can defraud these people by not telling them that you're basically spamming other users and upvoting yourself. They're delegating to you based on misinformation.
So the community support system that you praised just 2 comments ago is now no longer supported by you? Again, look at the mentions. Read a few. They're users informing other users to stop plagiarising. endingplagiarism keeps a record of this so that other users are aware. How is that one person making the decisions? Then she shares a daily report with pending rewards. More visibility and clarity of activities. Just because these facts don't fit with your argument, does not make them lies (or whatever else you've called them over the past 2 hours).
In addition, I don't have any delegations. endingplagiarism does from people who support what she's doing and with everything being visible on the blockchain, she'd do well to defraud anybody. Unlike an election, delegations can be removed very quickly and easily. You're not stuck with them for 4 years.
What?
Who's doing the downvoting? Who decides who gets downvoted? It's your decision. Yeah, they comment and point fingers, but in the end, who's decision is it? Who hits the downvote button? Is it them? They have to assume that you're doing what's best for them.
Show them what you're doing. That you're downvoting all my content. ALL of it. Show them there's no active spamming. No farming. Ask them whether you should keep downvoting me. Go on.
Rewards? Last I checked, you didn't get rewards for downvoting.
Soooo...I can go to these reports and see @r351574nc3 posts that were downvoted for plagiarism and spam, correct? Because you're so transparent.
You are defrauding people by downvoting and not posting it in your report.